summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE')
-rw-r--r--libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE310
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 310 deletions
diff --git a/libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE b/libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE
deleted file mode 100644
index 75e7ebbb93..0000000000
--- a/libs/libcurl/docs/CONTRIBUTE
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,310 +0,0 @@
- _ _ ____ _
- ___| | | | _ \| |
- / __| | | | |_) | |
- | (__| |_| | _ <| |___
- \___|\___/|_| \_\_____|
-
- When Contributing Source Code
-
- This document is intended to offer guidelines that can be useful to keep in
- mind when you decide to contribute to the project. This concerns new features
- as well as corrections to existing flaws or bugs.
-
- 1. Learning cURL
- 1.1 Join the Community
- 1.2 License
- 1.3 What To Read
-
- 2. cURL Coding Standards
- 2.1 Naming
- 2.2 Indenting
- 2.3 Commenting
- 2.4 Line Lengths
- 2.5 General Style
- 2.6 Non-clobbering All Over
- 2.7 Platform Dependent Code
- 2.8 Write Separate Patches
- 2.9 Patch Against Recent Sources
- 2.10 Document
- 2.11 Test Cases
-
- 3. Pushing Out Your Changes
- 3.1 Write Access to git Repository
- 3.2 How To Make a Patch with git
- 3.3 How To Make a Patch without git
- 3.4 How to get your changes into the main sources
- 3.5 Write good commit messages
- 3.6 Please don't send pull requests
-
-==============================================================================
-
-1. Learning cURL
-
-1.1 Join the Community
-
- Skip over to http://curl.haxx.se/mail/ and join the appropriate mailing
- list(s). Read up on details before you post questions. Read this file before
- you start sending patches! We prefer patches and discussions being held on
- the mailing list(s), not sent to individuals.
-
- Before posting to one of the curl mailing lists, please read up on the mailing
- list etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
-
- We also hang out on IRC in #curl on irc.freenode.net
-
-1.2. License
-
- When contributing with code, you agree to put your changes and new code under
- the same license curl and libcurl is already using unless stated and agreed
- otherwise.
-
- If you add a larger piece of code, you can opt to make that file or set of
- files to use a different license as long as they don't enforce any changes to
- the rest of the package and they make sense. Such "separate parts" can not be
- GPL licensed (as we don't want copyleft to affect users of libcurl) but they
- must use "GPL compatible" licenses (as we want to allow users to use libcurl
- properly in GPL licensed environments).
-
- When changing existing source code, you do not alter the copyright of the
- original file(s). The copyright will still be owned by the original
- creator(s) or those who have been assigned copyright by the original
- author(s).
-
- By submitting a patch to the curl project, you are assumed to have the right
- to the code and to be allowed by your employer or whatever to hand over that
- patch/code to us. We will credit you for your changes as far as possible, to
- give credit but also to keep a trace back to who made what changes. Please
- always provide us with your full real name when contributing!
-
-1.3 What To Read
-
- Source code, the man pages, the INTERNALS document, TODO, KNOWN_BUGS, the
- most recent CHANGES. Just lurking on the curl-library mailing list is gonna
- give you a lot of insights on what's going on right now. Asking there is a
- good idea too.
-
-2. cURL Coding Standards
-
-2.1 Naming
-
- Try using a non-confusing naming scheme for your new functions and variable
- names. It doesn't necessarily have to mean that you should use the same as in
- other places of the code, just that the names should be logical,
- understandable and be named according to what they're used for. File-local
- functions should be made static. We like lower case names.
-
- See the INTERNALS document on how we name non-exported library-global
- symbols.
-
-2.2 Indenting
-
- Use the same indenting levels and bracing method as all the other code
- already does. It makes the source code easier to follow if all of it is
- written using the same style. We don't ask you to like it, we just ask you to
- follow the tradition! ;-) This mainly means: 2-level indents, using spaces
- only (no tabs) and having the opening brace ({) on the same line as the if()
- or while().
-
- Also note that we use if() and while() with no space before the parenthesis.
-
-2.3 Commenting
-
- Comment your source code extensively using C comments (/* comment */), DO NOT
- use C++ comments (// this style). Commented code is quality code and enables
- future modifications much more. Uncommented code risk having to be completely
- replaced when someone wants to extend things, since other persons' source
- code can get quite hard to read.
-
-2.4 Line Lengths
-
- We write source lines shorter than 80 columns.
-
-2.5 General Style
-
- Keep your functions small. If they're small you avoid a lot of mistakes and
- you don't accidentally mix up variables etc.
-
-2.6 Non-clobbering All Over
-
- When you write new functionality or fix bugs, it is important that you don't
- fiddle all over the source files and functions. Remember that it is likely
- that other people have done changes in the same source files as you have and
- possibly even in the same functions. If you bring completely new
- functionality, try writing it in a new source file. If you fix bugs, try to
- fix one bug at a time and send them as separate patches.
-
-2.7 Platform Dependent Code
-
- Use #ifdef HAVE_FEATURE to do conditional code. We avoid checking for
- particular operating systems or hardware in the #ifdef lines. The
- HAVE_FEATURE shall be generated by the configure script for unix-like systems
- and they are hard-coded in the config-[system].h files for the others.
-
-2.8 Write Separate Patches
-
- It is annoying when you get a huge patch from someone that is said to fix 511
- odd problems, but discussions and opinions don't agree with 510 of them - or
- 509 of them were already fixed in a different way. Then the patcher needs to
- extract the single interesting patch from somewhere within the huge pile of
- source, and that gives a lot of extra work. Preferably, all fixes that
- correct different problems should be in their own patch with an attached
- description exactly what they correct so that all patches can be selectively
- applied by the maintainer or other interested parties.
-
- Also, separate patches enable bisecting much better when we track problems in
- the future.
-
-2.9 Patch Against Recent Sources
-
- Please try to get the latest available sources to make your patches
- against. It makes the life of the developers so much easier. The very best is
- if you get the most up-to-date sources from the git repository, but the
- latest release archive is quite OK as well!
-
-2.10 Document
-
- Writing docs is dead boring and one of the big problems with many open source
- projects. Someone's gotta do it. It makes it a lot easier if you submit a
- small description of your fix or your new features with every contribution so
- that it can be swiftly added to the package documentation.
-
- The documentation is always made in man pages (nroff formatted) or plain
- ASCII files. All HTML files on the web site and in the release archives are
- generated from the nroff/ASCII versions.
-
-2.11 Test Cases
-
- Since the introduction of the test suite, we can quickly verify that the main
- features are working as they're supposed to. To maintain this situation and
- improve it, all new features and functions that are added need to be tested
- in the test suite. Every feature that is added should get at least one valid
- test case that verifies that it works as documented. If every submitter also
- posts a few test cases, it won't end up as a heavy burden on a single person!
-
- If you don't have test cases or perhaps you have done something that is very
- hard to write tests for, do explain exactly how you have otherwise tested and
- verified your changes.
-
-3. Pushing Out Your Changes
-
-3.1 Write Access to git Repository
-
- If you are a frequent contributor, or have another good reason, you can of
- course get write access to the git repository and then you'll be able to push
- your changes straight into the git repo instead of sending changes by mail as
- patches. Just ask if this is what you'd want. You will be required to have
- posted a few quality patches first, before you can be granted push access.
-
-3.2 How To Make a Patch with git
-
- You need to first checkout the repository:
-
- git clone git://github.com/bagder/curl.git
-
- You then proceed and edit all the files you like and you commit them to your
- local repository:
-
- git commit [file]
-
- As usual, group your commits so that you commit all changes that at once that
- constitutes a logical change. See also section "3.5 Write good commit
- messages".
-
- Once you have done all your commits and you're happy with what you see, you
- can make patches out of your changes that are suitable for mailing:
-
- git format-patch remotes/origin/master
-
- This creates files in your local directory named NNNN-[name].patch for each
- commit.
-
- Now send those patches off to the curl-library list. You can of course opt to
- do that with the 'git send-email' command.
-
-3.3 How To Make a Patch without git
-
- Keep a copy of the unmodified curl sources. Make your changes in a separate
- source tree. When you think you have something that you want to offer the
- curl community, use GNU diff to generate patches.
-
- If you have modified a single file, try something like:
-
- diff -u unmodified-file.c my-changed-one.c > my-fixes.diff
-
- If you have modified several files, possibly in different directories, you
- can use diff recursively:
-
- diff -ur curl-original-dir curl-modified-sources-dir > my-fixes.diff
-
- The GNU diff and GNU patch tools exist for virtually all platforms, including
- all kinds of Unixes and Windows:
-
- For unix-like operating systems:
-
- http://www.gnu.org/software/patch/patch.html
- http://www.gnu.org/directory/diffutils.html
-
- For Windows:
-
- http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm
- http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm
-
-3.4 How to get your changes into the main sources
-
- Submit your patch to the curl-library mailing list.
-
- Make the patch against as recent sources as possible.
-
- Make sure your patch adheres to the source indent and coding style of already
- existing source code. Failing to do so just adds more work for me.
-
- Respond to replies on the list about the patch and answer questions and/or
- fix nits/flaws. This is very important. I will take lack of replies as a sign
- that you're not very anxious to get your patch accepted and I tend to simply
- drop such patches from my TODO list.
-
- If you've followed the above paragraphs and your patch still hasn't been
- incorporated after some weeks, consider resubmitting it to the list.
-
-3.5 Write good commit messages
-
- A short guide to how to do fine commit messages in the curl project.
-
- ---- start ----
- [area]: [short line describing the main effect]
-
- [separate the above single line from the rest with an empty line]
-
- [full description, no wider than 72 columns that describe as much as
- possible as to why this change is made, and possibly what things
- it fixes and everything else that is related]
- ---- stop ----
-
- Don't forget to use commit --author="" if you commit someone else's work,
- and make sure that you have your own user and email setup correctly in git
- before you commit
-
-3.6 Please don't send pull requests
-
- With git (and especially github) it is easy and tempting to send a pull
- request to one or more people in the curl project to have changes merged this
- way instead of mailing patches to the curl-library mailing list.
-
- We don't like that. We want them mailed for these reasons:
-
- - Peer review. Anyone and everyone on the list can review, comment and
- improve on the patch. Pull requests limit this ability.
-
- - Anyone can merge the patch into their own trees for testing and those who
- have push rights can push it to the main repo. It doesn't have to be anyone
- the patch author knows beforehand.
-
- - Commit messages can be tweaked and changed if merged locally instead of
- using github. Merges directly on github requires the changes to be perfect
- already, which they seldom are.
-
- - Merges on github prevents rebases and even enforces --no-ff which is a git
- style we don't otherwise use in the project
-
- However: once patches have been reviewed and deemed fine on list they are
- perfectly OK to be pulled from a published git tree.