diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrepattern.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrepattern.html | 3235 |
1 files changed, 3235 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrepattern.html b/plugins/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrepattern.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c06d1e03f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/plugins/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrepattern.html @@ -0,0 +1,3235 @@ +<html> +<head> +<title>pcrepattern specification</title> +</head> +<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#00005A" link="#0066FF" alink="#3399FF" vlink="#2222BB"> +<h1>pcrepattern man page</h1> +<p> +Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE index page</a>. +</p> +<p> +This page is part of the PCRE HTML documentation. It was generated automatically +from the original man page. If there is any nonsense in it, please consult the +man page, in case the conversion went wrong. +<br> +<ul> +<li><a name="TOC1" href="#SEC1">PCRE REGULAR EXPRESSION DETAILS</a> +<li><a name="TOC2" href="#SEC2">SPECIAL START-OF-PATTERN ITEMS</a> +<li><a name="TOC3" href="#SEC3">EBCDIC CHARACTER CODES</a> +<li><a name="TOC4" href="#SEC4">CHARACTERS AND METACHARACTERS</a> +<li><a name="TOC5" href="#SEC5">BACKSLASH</a> +<li><a name="TOC6" href="#SEC6">CIRCUMFLEX AND DOLLAR</a> +<li><a name="TOC7" href="#SEC7">FULL STOP (PERIOD, DOT) AND \N</a> +<li><a name="TOC8" href="#SEC8">MATCHING A SINGLE DATA UNIT</a> +<li><a name="TOC9" href="#SEC9">SQUARE BRACKETS AND CHARACTER CLASSES</a> +<li><a name="TOC10" href="#SEC10">POSIX CHARACTER CLASSES</a> +<li><a name="TOC11" href="#SEC11">COMPATIBILITY FEATURE FOR WORD BOUNDARIES</a> +<li><a name="TOC12" href="#SEC12">VERTICAL BAR</a> +<li><a name="TOC13" href="#SEC13">INTERNAL OPTION SETTING</a> +<li><a name="TOC14" href="#SEC14">SUBPATTERNS</a> +<li><a name="TOC15" href="#SEC15">DUPLICATE SUBPATTERN NUMBERS</a> +<li><a name="TOC16" href="#SEC16">NAMED SUBPATTERNS</a> +<li><a name="TOC17" href="#SEC17">REPETITION</a> +<li><a name="TOC18" href="#SEC18">ATOMIC GROUPING AND POSSESSIVE QUANTIFIERS</a> +<li><a name="TOC19" href="#SEC19">BACK REFERENCES</a> +<li><a name="TOC20" href="#SEC20">ASSERTIONS</a> +<li><a name="TOC21" href="#SEC21">CONDITIONAL SUBPATTERNS</a> +<li><a name="TOC22" href="#SEC22">COMMENTS</a> +<li><a name="TOC23" href="#SEC23">RECURSIVE PATTERNS</a> +<li><a name="TOC24" href="#SEC24">SUBPATTERNS AS SUBROUTINES</a> +<li><a name="TOC25" href="#SEC25">ONIGURUMA SUBROUTINE SYNTAX</a> +<li><a name="TOC26" href="#SEC26">CALLOUTS</a> +<li><a name="TOC27" href="#SEC27">BACKTRACKING CONTROL</a> +<li><a name="TOC28" href="#SEC28">SEE ALSO</a> +<li><a name="TOC29" href="#SEC29">AUTHOR</a> +<li><a name="TOC30" href="#SEC30">REVISION</a> +</ul> +<br><a name="SEC1" href="#TOC1">PCRE REGULAR EXPRESSION DETAILS</a><br> +<P> +The syntax and semantics of the regular expressions that are supported by PCRE +are described in detail below. There is a quick-reference syntax summary in the +<a href="pcresyntax.html"><b>pcresyntax</b></a> +page. PCRE tries to match Perl syntax and semantics as closely as it can. PCRE +also supports some alternative regular expression syntax (which does not +conflict with the Perl syntax) in order to provide some compatibility with +regular expressions in Python, .NET, and Oniguruma. +</P> +<P> +Perl's regular expressions are described in its own documentation, and +regular expressions in general are covered in a number of books, some of which +have copious examples. Jeffrey Friedl's "Mastering Regular Expressions", +published by O'Reilly, covers regular expressions in great detail. This +description of PCRE's regular expressions is intended as reference material. +</P> +<P> +This document discusses the patterns that are supported by PCRE when one its +main matching functions, <b>pcre_exec()</b> (8-bit) or <b>pcre[16|32]_exec()</b> +(16- or 32-bit), is used. PCRE also has alternative matching functions, +<b>pcre_dfa_exec()</b> and <b>pcre[16|32_dfa_exec()</b>, which match using a +different algorithm that is not Perl-compatible. Some of the features discussed +below are not available when DFA matching is used. The advantages and +disadvantages of the alternative functions, and how they differ from the normal +functions, are discussed in the +<a href="pcrematching.html"><b>pcrematching</b></a> +page. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC2" href="#TOC1">SPECIAL START-OF-PATTERN ITEMS</a><br> +<P> +A number of options that can be passed to <b>pcre_compile()</b> can also be set +by special items at the start of a pattern. These are not Perl-compatible, but +are provided to make these options accessible to pattern writers who are not +able to change the program that processes the pattern. Any number of these +items may appear, but they must all be together right at the start of the +pattern string, and the letters must be in upper case. +</P> +<br><b> +UTF support +</b><br> +<P> +The original operation of PCRE was on strings of one-byte characters. However, +there is now also support for UTF-8 strings in the original library, an +extra library that supports 16-bit and UTF-16 character strings, and a +third library that supports 32-bit and UTF-32 character strings. To use these +features, PCRE must be built to include appropriate support. When using UTF +strings you must either call the compiling function with the PCRE_UTF8, +PCRE_UTF16, or PCRE_UTF32 option, or the pattern must start with one of +these special sequences: +<pre> + (*UTF8) + (*UTF16) + (*UTF32) + (*UTF) +</pre> +(*UTF) is a generic sequence that can be used with any of the libraries. +Starting a pattern with such a sequence is equivalent to setting the relevant +option. How setting a UTF mode affects pattern matching is mentioned in several +places below. There is also a summary of features in the +<a href="pcreunicode.html"><b>pcreunicode</b></a> +page. +</P> +<P> +Some applications that allow their users to supply patterns may wish to +restrict them to non-UTF data for security reasons. If the PCRE_NEVER_UTF +option is set at compile time, (*UTF) etc. are not allowed, and their +appearance causes an error. +</P> +<br><b> +Unicode property support +</b><br> +<P> +Another special sequence that may appear at the start of a pattern is (*UCP). +This has the same effect as setting the PCRE_UCP option: it causes sequences +such as \d and \w to use Unicode properties to determine character types, +instead of recognizing only characters with codes less than 128 via a lookup +table. +</P> +<br><b> +Disabling auto-possessification +</b><br> +<P> +If a pattern starts with (*NO_AUTO_POSSESS), it has the same effect as setting +the PCRE_NO_AUTO_POSSESS option at compile time. This stops PCRE from making +quantifiers possessive when what follows cannot match the repeated item. For +example, by default a+b is treated as a++b. For more details, see the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +documentation. +</P> +<br><b> +Disabling start-up optimizations +</b><br> +<P> +If a pattern starts with (*NO_START_OPT), it has the same effect as setting the +PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE option either at compile or matching time. This disables +several optimizations for quickly reaching "no match" results. For more +details, see the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +documentation. +<a name="newlines"></a></P> +<br><b> +Newline conventions +</b><br> +<P> +PCRE supports five different conventions for indicating line breaks in +strings: a single CR (carriage return) character, a single LF (linefeed) +character, the two-character sequence CRLF, any of the three preceding, or any +Unicode newline sequence. The +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +page has +<a href="pcreapi.html#newlines">further discussion</a> +about newlines, and shows how to set the newline convention in the +<i>options</i> arguments for the compiling and matching functions. +</P> +<P> +It is also possible to specify a newline convention by starting a pattern +string with one of the following five sequences: +<pre> + (*CR) carriage return + (*LF) linefeed + (*CRLF) carriage return, followed by linefeed + (*ANYCRLF) any of the three above + (*ANY) all Unicode newline sequences +</pre> +These override the default and the options given to the compiling function. For +example, on a Unix system where LF is the default newline sequence, the pattern +<pre> + (*CR)a.b +</pre> +changes the convention to CR. That pattern matches "a\nb" because LF is no +longer a newline. If more than one of these settings is present, the last one +is used. +</P> +<P> +The newline convention affects where the circumflex and dollar assertions are +true. It also affects the interpretation of the dot metacharacter when +PCRE_DOTALL is not set, and the behaviour of \N. However, it does not affect +what the \R escape sequence matches. By default, this is any Unicode newline +sequence, for Perl compatibility. However, this can be changed; see the +description of \R in the section entitled +<a href="#newlineseq">"Newline sequences"</a> +below. A change of \R setting can be combined with a change of newline +convention. +</P> +<br><b> +Setting match and recursion limits +</b><br> +<P> +The caller of <b>pcre_exec()</b> can set a limit on the number of times the +internal <b>match()</b> function is called and on the maximum depth of +recursive calls. These facilities are provided to catch runaway matches that +are provoked by patterns with huge matching trees (a typical example is a +pattern with nested unlimited repeats) and to avoid running out of system stack +by too much recursion. When one of these limits is reached, <b>pcre_exec()</b> +gives an error return. The limits can also be set by items at the start of the +pattern of the form +<pre> + (*LIMIT_MATCH=d) + (*LIMIT_RECURSION=d) +</pre> +where d is any number of decimal digits. However, the value of the setting must +be less than the value set (or defaulted) by the caller of <b>pcre_exec()</b> +for it to have any effect. In other words, the pattern writer can lower the +limits set by the programmer, but not raise them. If there is more than one +setting of one of these limits, the lower value is used. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC3" href="#TOC1">EBCDIC CHARACTER CODES</a><br> +<P> +PCRE can be compiled to run in an environment that uses EBCDIC as its character +code rather than ASCII or Unicode (typically a mainframe system). In the +sections below, character code values are ASCII or Unicode; in an EBCDIC +environment these characters may have different code values, and there are no +code points greater than 255. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC4" href="#TOC1">CHARACTERS AND METACHARACTERS</a><br> +<P> +A regular expression is a pattern that is matched against a subject string from +left to right. Most characters stand for themselves in a pattern, and match the +corresponding characters in the subject. As a trivial example, the pattern +<pre> + The quick brown fox +</pre> +matches a portion of a subject string that is identical to itself. When +caseless matching is specified (the PCRE_CASELESS option), letters are matched +independently of case. In a UTF mode, PCRE always understands the concept of +case for characters whose values are less than 128, so caseless matching is +always possible. For characters with higher values, the concept of case is +supported if PCRE is compiled with Unicode property support, but not otherwise. +If you want to use caseless matching for characters 128 and above, you must +ensure that PCRE is compiled with Unicode property support as well as with +UTF support. +</P> +<P> +The power of regular expressions comes from the ability to include alternatives +and repetitions in the pattern. These are encoded in the pattern by the use of +<i>metacharacters</i>, which do not stand for themselves but instead are +interpreted in some special way. +</P> +<P> +There are two different sets of metacharacters: those that are recognized +anywhere in the pattern except within square brackets, and those that are +recognized within square brackets. Outside square brackets, the metacharacters +are as follows: +<pre> + \ general escape character with several uses + ^ assert start of string (or line, in multiline mode) + $ assert end of string (or line, in multiline mode) + . match any character except newline (by default) + [ start character class definition + | start of alternative branch + ( start subpattern + ) end subpattern + ? extends the meaning of ( + also 0 or 1 quantifier + also quantifier minimizer + * 0 or more quantifier + + 1 or more quantifier + also "possessive quantifier" + { start min/max quantifier +</pre> +Part of a pattern that is in square brackets is called a "character class". In +a character class the only metacharacters are: +<pre> + \ general escape character + ^ negate the class, but only if the first character + - indicates character range + [ POSIX character class (only if followed by POSIX syntax) + ] terminates the character class +</pre> +The following sections describe the use of each of the metacharacters. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC5" href="#TOC1">BACKSLASH</a><br> +<P> +The backslash character has several uses. Firstly, if it is followed by a +character that is not a number or a letter, it takes away any special meaning +that character may have. This use of backslash as an escape character applies +both inside and outside character classes. +</P> +<P> +For example, if you want to match a * character, you write \* in the pattern. +This escaping action applies whether or not the following character would +otherwise be interpreted as a metacharacter, so it is always safe to precede a +non-alphanumeric with backslash to specify that it stands for itself. In +particular, if you want to match a backslash, you write \\. +</P> +<P> +In a UTF mode, only ASCII numbers and letters have any special meaning after a +backslash. All other characters (in particular, those whose codepoints are +greater than 127) are treated as literals. +</P> +<P> +If a pattern is compiled with the PCRE_EXTENDED option, most white space in the +pattern (other than in a character class), and characters between a # outside a +character class and the next newline, inclusive, are ignored. An escaping +backslash can be used to include a white space or # character as part of the +pattern. +</P> +<P> +If you want to remove the special meaning from a sequence of characters, you +can do so by putting them between \Q and \E. This is different from Perl in +that $ and @ are handled as literals in \Q...\E sequences in PCRE, whereas in +Perl, $ and @ cause variable interpolation. Note the following examples: +<pre> + Pattern PCRE matches Perl matches + + \Qabc$xyz\E abc$xyz abc followed by the contents of $xyz + \Qabc\$xyz\E abc\$xyz abc\$xyz + \Qabc\E\$\Qxyz\E abc$xyz abc$xyz +</pre> +The \Q...\E sequence is recognized both inside and outside character classes. +An isolated \E that is not preceded by \Q is ignored. If \Q is not followed +by \E later in the pattern, the literal interpretation continues to the end of +the pattern (that is, \E is assumed at the end). If the isolated \Q is inside +a character class, this causes an error, because the character class is not +terminated. +<a name="digitsafterbackslash"></a></P> +<br><b> +Non-printing characters +</b><br> +<P> +A second use of backslash provides a way of encoding non-printing characters +in patterns in a visible manner. There is no restriction on the appearance of +non-printing characters, apart from the binary zero that terminates a pattern, +but when a pattern is being prepared by text editing, it is often easier to use +one of the following escape sequences than the binary character it represents: +<pre> + \a alarm, that is, the BEL character (hex 07) + \cx "control-x", where x is any ASCII character + \e escape (hex 1B) + \f form feed (hex 0C) + \n linefeed (hex 0A) + \r carriage return (hex 0D) + \t tab (hex 09) + \0dd character with octal code 0dd + \ddd character with octal code ddd, or back reference + \o{ddd..} character with octal code ddd.. + \xhh character with hex code hh + \x{hhh..} character with hex code hhh.. (non-JavaScript mode) + \uhhhh character with hex code hhhh (JavaScript mode only) +</pre> +The precise effect of \cx on ASCII characters is as follows: if x is a lower +case letter, it is converted to upper case. Then bit 6 of the character (hex +40) is inverted. Thus \cA to \cZ become hex 01 to hex 1A (A is 41, Z is 5A), +but \c{ becomes hex 3B ({ is 7B), and \c; becomes hex 7B (; is 3B). If the +data item (byte or 16-bit value) following \c has a value greater than 127, a +compile-time error occurs. This locks out non-ASCII characters in all modes. +</P> +<P> +The \c facility was designed for use with ASCII characters, but with the +extension to Unicode it is even less useful than it once was. It is, however, +recognized when PCRE is compiled in EBCDIC mode, where data items are always +bytes. In this mode, all values are valid after \c. If the next character is a +lower case letter, it is converted to upper case. Then the 0xc0 bits of the +byte are inverted. Thus \cA becomes hex 01, as in ASCII (A is C1), but because +the EBCDIC letters are disjoint, \cZ becomes hex 29 (Z is E9), and other +characters also generate different values. +</P> +<P> +After \0 up to two further octal digits are read. If there are fewer than two +digits, just those that are present are used. Thus the sequence \0\x\07 +specifies two binary zeros followed by a BEL character (code value 7). Make +sure you supply two digits after the initial zero if the pattern character that +follows is itself an octal digit. +</P> +<P> +The escape \o must be followed by a sequence of octal digits, enclosed in +braces. An error occurs if this is not the case. This escape is a recent +addition to Perl; it provides way of specifying character code points as octal +numbers greater than 0777, and it also allows octal numbers and back references +to be unambiguously specified. +</P> +<P> +For greater clarity and unambiguity, it is best to avoid following \ by a +digit greater than zero. Instead, use \o{} or \x{} to specify character +numbers, and \g{} to specify back references. The following paragraphs +describe the old, ambiguous syntax. +</P> +<P> +The handling of a backslash followed by a digit other than 0 is complicated, +and Perl has changed in recent releases, causing PCRE also to change. Outside a +character class, PCRE reads the digit and any following digits as a decimal +number. If the number is less than 8, or if there have been at least that many +previous capturing left parentheses in the expression, the entire sequence is +taken as a <i>back reference</i>. A description of how this works is given +<a href="#backreferences">later,</a> +following the discussion of +<a href="#subpattern">parenthesized subpatterns.</a> +</P> +<P> +Inside a character class, or if the decimal number following \ is greater than +7 and there have not been that many capturing subpatterns, PCRE handles \8 and +\9 as the literal characters "8" and "9", and otherwise re-reads up to three +octal digits following the backslash, using them to generate a data character. +Any subsequent digits stand for themselves. For example: +<pre> + \040 is another way of writing an ASCII space + \40 is the same, provided there are fewer than 40 previous capturing subpatterns + \7 is always a back reference + \11 might be a back reference, or another way of writing a tab + \011 is always a tab + \0113 is a tab followed by the character "3" + \113 might be a back reference, otherwise the character with octal code 113 + \377 might be a back reference, otherwise the value 255 (decimal) + \81 is either a back reference, or the two characters "8" and "1" +</pre> +Note that octal values of 100 or greater that are specified using this syntax +must not be introduced by a leading zero, because no more than three octal +digits are ever read. +</P> +<P> +By default, after \x that is not followed by {, from zero to two hexadecimal +digits are read (letters can be in upper or lower case). Any number of +hexadecimal digits may appear between \x{ and }. If a character other than +a hexadecimal digit appears between \x{ and }, or if there is no terminating +}, an error occurs. +</P> +<P> +If the PCRE_JAVASCRIPT_COMPAT option is set, the interpretation of \x is +as just described only when it is followed by two hexadecimal digits. +Otherwise, it matches a literal "x" character. In JavaScript mode, support for +code points greater than 256 is provided by \u, which must be followed by +four hexadecimal digits; otherwise it matches a literal "u" character. +</P> +<P> +Characters whose value is less than 256 can be defined by either of the two +syntaxes for \x (or by \u in JavaScript mode). There is no difference in the +way they are handled. For example, \xdc is exactly the same as \x{dc} (or +\u00dc in JavaScript mode). +</P> +<br><b> +Constraints on character values +</b><br> +<P> +Characters that are specified using octal or hexadecimal numbers are +limited to certain values, as follows: +<pre> + 8-bit non-UTF mode less than 0x100 + 8-bit UTF-8 mode less than 0x10ffff and a valid codepoint + 16-bit non-UTF mode less than 0x10000 + 16-bit UTF-16 mode less than 0x10ffff and a valid codepoint + 32-bit non-UTF mode less than 0x100000000 + 32-bit UTF-32 mode less than 0x10ffff and a valid codepoint +</pre> +Invalid Unicode codepoints are the range 0xd800 to 0xdfff (the so-called +"surrogate" codepoints), and 0xffef. +</P> +<br><b> +Escape sequences in character classes +</b><br> +<P> +All the sequences that define a single character value can be used both inside +and outside character classes. In addition, inside a character class, \b is +interpreted as the backspace character (hex 08). +</P> +<P> +\N is not allowed in a character class. \B, \R, and \X are not special +inside a character class. Like other unrecognized escape sequences, they are +treated as the literal characters "B", "R", and "X" by default, but cause an +error if the PCRE_EXTRA option is set. Outside a character class, these +sequences have different meanings. +</P> +<br><b> +Unsupported escape sequences +</b><br> +<P> +In Perl, the sequences \l, \L, \u, and \U are recognized by its string +handler and used to modify the case of following characters. By default, PCRE +does not support these escape sequences. However, if the PCRE_JAVASCRIPT_COMPAT +option is set, \U matches a "U" character, and \u can be used to define a +character by code point, as described in the previous section. +</P> +<br><b> +Absolute and relative back references +</b><br> +<P> +The sequence \g followed by an unsigned or a negative number, optionally +enclosed in braces, is an absolute or relative back reference. A named back +reference can be coded as \g{name}. Back references are discussed +<a href="#backreferences">later,</a> +following the discussion of +<a href="#subpattern">parenthesized subpatterns.</a> +</P> +<br><b> +Absolute and relative subroutine calls +</b><br> +<P> +For compatibility with Oniguruma, the non-Perl syntax \g followed by a name or +a number enclosed either in angle brackets or single quotes, is an alternative +syntax for referencing a subpattern as a "subroutine". Details are discussed +<a href="#onigurumasubroutines">later.</a> +Note that \g{...} (Perl syntax) and \g<...> (Oniguruma syntax) are <i>not</i> +synonymous. The former is a back reference; the latter is a +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">subroutine</a> +call. +<a name="genericchartypes"></a></P> +<br><b> +Generic character types +</b><br> +<P> +Another use of backslash is for specifying generic character types: +<pre> + \d any decimal digit + \D any character that is not a decimal digit + \h any horizontal white space character + \H any character that is not a horizontal white space character + \s any white space character + \S any character that is not a white space character + \v any vertical white space character + \V any character that is not a vertical white space character + \w any "word" character + \W any "non-word" character +</pre> +There is also the single sequence \N, which matches a non-newline character. +This is the same as +<a href="#fullstopdot">the "." metacharacter</a> +when PCRE_DOTALL is not set. Perl also uses \N to match characters by name; +PCRE does not support this. +</P> +<P> +Each pair of lower and upper case escape sequences partitions the complete set +of characters into two disjoint sets. Any given character matches one, and only +one, of each pair. The sequences can appear both inside and outside character +classes. They each match one character of the appropriate type. If the current +matching point is at the end of the subject string, all of them fail, because +there is no character to match. +</P> +<P> +For compatibility with Perl, \s did not used to match the VT character (code +11), which made it different from the the POSIX "space" class. However, Perl +added VT at release 5.18, and PCRE followed suit at release 8.34. The default +\s characters are now HT (9), LF (10), VT (11), FF (12), CR (13), and space +(32), which are defined as white space in the "C" locale. This list may vary if +locale-specific matching is taking place. For example, in some locales the +"non-breaking space" character (\xA0) is recognized as white space, and in +others the VT character is not. +</P> +<P> +A "word" character is an underscore or any character that is a letter or digit. +By default, the definition of letters and digits is controlled by PCRE's +low-valued character tables, and may vary if locale-specific matching is taking +place (see +<a href="pcreapi.html#localesupport">"Locale support"</a> +in the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +page). For example, in a French locale such as "fr_FR" in Unix-like systems, +or "french" in Windows, some character codes greater than 127 are used for +accented letters, and these are then matched by \w. The use of locales with +Unicode is discouraged. +</P> +<P> +By default, characters whose code points are greater than 127 never match \d, +\s, or \w, and always match \D, \S, and \W, although this may vary for +characters in the range 128-255 when locale-specific matching is happening. +These escape sequences retain their original meanings from before Unicode +support was available, mainly for efficiency reasons. If PCRE is compiled with +Unicode property support, and the PCRE_UCP option is set, the behaviour is +changed so that Unicode properties are used to determine character types, as +follows: +<pre> + \d any character that matches \p{Nd} (decimal digit) + \s any character that matches \p{Z} or \h or \v + \w any character that matches \p{L} or \p{N}, plus underscore +</pre> +The upper case escapes match the inverse sets of characters. Note that \d +matches only decimal digits, whereas \w matches any Unicode digit, as well as +any Unicode letter, and underscore. Note also that PCRE_UCP affects \b, and +\B because they are defined in terms of \w and \W. Matching these sequences +is noticeably slower when PCRE_UCP is set. +</P> +<P> +The sequences \h, \H, \v, and \V are features that were added to Perl at +release 5.10. In contrast to the other sequences, which match only ASCII +characters by default, these always match certain high-valued code points, +whether or not PCRE_UCP is set. The horizontal space characters are: +<pre> + U+0009 Horizontal tab (HT) + U+0020 Space + U+00A0 Non-break space + U+1680 Ogham space mark + U+180E Mongolian vowel separator + U+2000 En quad + U+2001 Em quad + U+2002 En space + U+2003 Em space + U+2004 Three-per-em space + U+2005 Four-per-em space + U+2006 Six-per-em space + U+2007 Figure space + U+2008 Punctuation space + U+2009 Thin space + U+200A Hair space + U+202F Narrow no-break space + U+205F Medium mathematical space + U+3000 Ideographic space +</pre> +The vertical space characters are: +<pre> + U+000A Linefeed (LF) + U+000B Vertical tab (VT) + U+000C Form feed (FF) + U+000D Carriage return (CR) + U+0085 Next line (NEL) + U+2028 Line separator + U+2029 Paragraph separator +</pre> +In 8-bit, non-UTF-8 mode, only the characters with codepoints less than 256 are +relevant. +<a name="newlineseq"></a></P> +<br><b> +Newline sequences +</b><br> +<P> +Outside a character class, by default, the escape sequence \R matches any +Unicode newline sequence. In 8-bit non-UTF-8 mode \R is equivalent to the +following: +<pre> + (?>\r\n|\n|\x0b|\f|\r|\x85) +</pre> +This is an example of an "atomic group", details of which are given +<a href="#atomicgroup">below.</a> +This particular group matches either the two-character sequence CR followed by +LF, or one of the single characters LF (linefeed, U+000A), VT (vertical tab, +U+000B), FF (form feed, U+000C), CR (carriage return, U+000D), or NEL (next +line, U+0085). The two-character sequence is treated as a single unit that +cannot be split. +</P> +<P> +In other modes, two additional characters whose codepoints are greater than 255 +are added: LS (line separator, U+2028) and PS (paragraph separator, U+2029). +Unicode character property support is not needed for these characters to be +recognized. +</P> +<P> +It is possible to restrict \R to match only CR, LF, or CRLF (instead of the +complete set of Unicode line endings) by setting the option PCRE_BSR_ANYCRLF +either at compile time or when the pattern is matched. (BSR is an abbrevation +for "backslash R".) This can be made the default when PCRE is built; if this is +the case, the other behaviour can be requested via the PCRE_BSR_UNICODE option. +It is also possible to specify these settings by starting a pattern string with +one of the following sequences: +<pre> + (*BSR_ANYCRLF) CR, LF, or CRLF only + (*BSR_UNICODE) any Unicode newline sequence +</pre> +These override the default and the options given to the compiling function, but +they can themselves be overridden by options given to a matching function. Note +that these special settings, which are not Perl-compatible, are recognized only +at the very start of a pattern, and that they must be in upper case. If more +than one of them is present, the last one is used. They can be combined with a +change of newline convention; for example, a pattern can start with: +<pre> + (*ANY)(*BSR_ANYCRLF) +</pre> +They can also be combined with the (*UTF8), (*UTF16), (*UTF32), (*UTF) or +(*UCP) special sequences. Inside a character class, \R is treated as an +unrecognized escape sequence, and so matches the letter "R" by default, but +causes an error if PCRE_EXTRA is set. +<a name="uniextseq"></a></P> +<br><b> +Unicode character properties +</b><br> +<P> +When PCRE is built with Unicode character property support, three additional +escape sequences that match characters with specific properties are available. +When in 8-bit non-UTF-8 mode, these sequences are of course limited to testing +characters whose codepoints are less than 256, but they do work in this mode. +The extra escape sequences are: +<pre> + \p{<i>xx</i>} a character with the <i>xx</i> property + \P{<i>xx</i>} a character without the <i>xx</i> property + \X a Unicode extended grapheme cluster +</pre> +The property names represented by <i>xx</i> above are limited to the Unicode +script names, the general category properties, "Any", which matches any +character (including newline), and some special PCRE properties (described +in the +<a href="#extraprops">next section).</a> +Other Perl properties such as "InMusicalSymbols" are not currently supported by +PCRE. Note that \P{Any} does not match any characters, so always causes a +match failure. +</P> +<P> +Sets of Unicode characters are defined as belonging to certain scripts. A +character from one of these sets can be matched using a script name. For +example: +<pre> + \p{Greek} + \P{Han} +</pre> +Those that are not part of an identified script are lumped together as +"Common". The current list of scripts is: +</P> +<P> +Arabic, +Armenian, +Avestan, +Balinese, +Bamum, +Batak, +Bengali, +Bopomofo, +Brahmi, +Braille, +Buginese, +Buhid, +Canadian_Aboriginal, +Carian, +Chakma, +Cham, +Cherokee, +Common, +Coptic, +Cuneiform, +Cypriot, +Cyrillic, +Deseret, +Devanagari, +Egyptian_Hieroglyphs, +Ethiopic, +Georgian, +Glagolitic, +Gothic, +Greek, +Gujarati, +Gurmukhi, +Han, +Hangul, +Hanunoo, +Hebrew, +Hiragana, +Imperial_Aramaic, +Inherited, +Inscriptional_Pahlavi, +Inscriptional_Parthian, +Javanese, +Kaithi, +Kannada, +Katakana, +Kayah_Li, +Kharoshthi, +Khmer, +Lao, +Latin, +Lepcha, +Limbu, +Linear_B, +Lisu, +Lycian, +Lydian, +Malayalam, +Mandaic, +Meetei_Mayek, +Meroitic_Cursive, +Meroitic_Hieroglyphs, +Miao, +Mongolian, +Myanmar, +New_Tai_Lue, +Nko, +Ogham, +Old_Italic, +Old_Persian, +Old_South_Arabian, +Old_Turkic, +Ol_Chiki, +Oriya, +Osmanya, +Phags_Pa, +Phoenician, +Rejang, +Runic, +Samaritan, +Saurashtra, +Sharada, +Shavian, +Sinhala, +Sora_Sompeng, +Sundanese, +Syloti_Nagri, +Syriac, +Tagalog, +Tagbanwa, +Tai_Le, +Tai_Tham, +Tai_Viet, +Takri, +Tamil, +Telugu, +Thaana, +Thai, +Tibetan, +Tifinagh, +Ugaritic, +Vai, +Yi. +</P> +<P> +Each character has exactly one Unicode general category property, specified by +a two-letter abbreviation. For compatibility with Perl, negation can be +specified by including a circumflex between the opening brace and the property +name. For example, \p{^Lu} is the same as \P{Lu}. +</P> +<P> +If only one letter is specified with \p or \P, it includes all the general +category properties that start with that letter. In this case, in the absence +of negation, the curly brackets in the escape sequence are optional; these two +examples have the same effect: +<pre> + \p{L} + \pL +</pre> +The following general category property codes are supported: +<pre> + C Other + Cc Control + Cf Format + Cn Unassigned + Co Private use + Cs Surrogate + + L Letter + Ll Lower case letter + Lm Modifier letter + Lo Other letter + Lt Title case letter + Lu Upper case letter + + M Mark + Mc Spacing mark + Me Enclosing mark + Mn Non-spacing mark + + N Number + Nd Decimal number + Nl Letter number + No Other number + + P Punctuation + Pc Connector punctuation + Pd Dash punctuation + Pe Close punctuation + Pf Final punctuation + Pi Initial punctuation + Po Other punctuation + Ps Open punctuation + + S Symbol + Sc Currency symbol + Sk Modifier symbol + Sm Mathematical symbol + So Other symbol + + Z Separator + Zl Line separator + Zp Paragraph separator + Zs Space separator +</pre> +The special property L& is also supported: it matches a character that has +the Lu, Ll, or Lt property, in other words, a letter that is not classified as +a modifier or "other". +</P> +<P> +The Cs (Surrogate) property applies only to characters in the range U+D800 to +U+DFFF. Such characters are not valid in Unicode strings and so +cannot be tested by PCRE, unless UTF validity checking has been turned off +(see the discussion of PCRE_NO_UTF8_CHECK, PCRE_NO_UTF16_CHECK and +PCRE_NO_UTF32_CHECK in the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +page). Perl does not support the Cs property. +</P> +<P> +The long synonyms for property names that Perl supports (such as \p{Letter}) +are not supported by PCRE, nor is it permitted to prefix any of these +properties with "Is". +</P> +<P> +No character that is in the Unicode table has the Cn (unassigned) property. +Instead, this property is assumed for any code point that is not in the +Unicode table. +</P> +<P> +Specifying caseless matching does not affect these escape sequences. For +example, \p{Lu} always matches only upper case letters. This is different from +the behaviour of current versions of Perl. +</P> +<P> +Matching characters by Unicode property is not fast, because PCRE has to do a +multistage table lookup in order to find a character's property. That is why +the traditional escape sequences such as \d and \w do not use Unicode +properties in PCRE by default, though you can make them do so by setting the +PCRE_UCP option or by starting the pattern with (*UCP). +</P> +<br><b> +Extended grapheme clusters +</b><br> +<P> +The \X escape matches any number of Unicode characters that form an "extended +grapheme cluster", and treats the sequence as an atomic group +<a href="#atomicgroup">(see below).</a> +Up to and including release 8.31, PCRE matched an earlier, simpler definition +that was equivalent to +<pre> + (?>\PM\pM*) +</pre> +That is, it matched a character without the "mark" property, followed by zero +or more characters with the "mark" property. Characters with the "mark" +property are typically non-spacing accents that affect the preceding character. +</P> +<P> +This simple definition was extended in Unicode to include more complicated +kinds of composite character by giving each character a grapheme breaking +property, and creating rules that use these properties to define the boundaries +of extended grapheme clusters. In releases of PCRE later than 8.31, \X matches +one of these clusters. +</P> +<P> +\X always matches at least one character. Then it decides whether to add +additional characters according to the following rules for ending a cluster: +</P> +<P> +1. End at the end of the subject string. +</P> +<P> +2. Do not end between CR and LF; otherwise end after any control character. +</P> +<P> +3. Do not break Hangul (a Korean script) syllable sequences. Hangul characters +are of five types: L, V, T, LV, and LVT. An L character may be followed by an +L, V, LV, or LVT character; an LV or V character may be followed by a V or T +character; an LVT or T character may be follwed only by a T character. +</P> +<P> +4. Do not end before extending characters or spacing marks. Characters with +the "mark" property always have the "extend" grapheme breaking property. +</P> +<P> +5. Do not end after prepend characters. +</P> +<P> +6. Otherwise, end the cluster. +<a name="extraprops"></a></P> +<br><b> +PCRE's additional properties +</b><br> +<P> +As well as the standard Unicode properties described above, PCRE supports four +more that make it possible to convert traditional escape sequences such as \w +and \s to use Unicode properties. PCRE uses these non-standard, non-Perl +properties internally when PCRE_UCP is set. However, they may also be used +explicitly. These properties are: +<pre> + Xan Any alphanumeric character + Xps Any POSIX space character + Xsp Any Perl space character + Xwd Any Perl "word" character +</pre> +Xan matches characters that have either the L (letter) or the N (number) +property. Xps matches the characters tab, linefeed, vertical tab, form feed, or +carriage return, and any other character that has the Z (separator) property. +Xsp is the same as Xps; it used to exclude vertical tab, for Perl +compatibility, but Perl changed, and so PCRE followed at release 8.34. Xwd +matches the same characters as Xan, plus underscore. +</P> +<P> +There is another non-standard property, Xuc, which matches any character that +can be represented by a Universal Character Name in C++ and other programming +languages. These are the characters $, @, ` (grave accent), and all characters +with Unicode code points greater than or equal to U+00A0, except for the +surrogates U+D800 to U+DFFF. Note that most base (ASCII) characters are +excluded. (Universal Character Names are of the form \uHHHH or \UHHHHHHHH +where H is a hexadecimal digit. Note that the Xuc property does not match these +sequences but the characters that they represent.) +<a name="resetmatchstart"></a></P> +<br><b> +Resetting the match start +</b><br> +<P> +The escape sequence \K causes any previously matched characters not to be +included in the final matched sequence. For example, the pattern: +<pre> + foo\Kbar +</pre> +matches "foobar", but reports that it has matched "bar". This feature is +similar to a lookbehind assertion +<a href="#lookbehind">(described below).</a> +However, in this case, the part of the subject before the real match does not +have to be of fixed length, as lookbehind assertions do. The use of \K does +not interfere with the setting of +<a href="#subpattern">captured substrings.</a> +For example, when the pattern +<pre> + (foo)\Kbar +</pre> +matches "foobar", the first substring is still set to "foo". +</P> +<P> +Perl documents that the use of \K within assertions is "not well defined". In +PCRE, \K is acted upon when it occurs inside positive assertions, but is +ignored in negative assertions. Note that when a pattern such as (?=ab\K) +matches, the reported start of the match can be greater than the end of the +match. +<a name="smallassertions"></a></P> +<br><b> +Simple assertions +</b><br> +<P> +The final use of backslash is for certain simple assertions. An assertion +specifies a condition that has to be met at a particular point in a match, +without consuming any characters from the subject string. The use of +subpatterns for more complicated assertions is described +<a href="#bigassertions">below.</a> +The backslashed assertions are: +<pre> + \b matches at a word boundary + \B matches when not at a word boundary + \A matches at the start of the subject + \Z matches at the end of the subject + also matches before a newline at the end of the subject + \z matches only at the end of the subject + \G matches at the first matching position in the subject +</pre> +Inside a character class, \b has a different meaning; it matches the backspace +character. If any other of these assertions appears in a character class, by +default it matches the corresponding literal character (for example, \B +matches the letter B). However, if the PCRE_EXTRA option is set, an "invalid +escape sequence" error is generated instead. +</P> +<P> +A word boundary is a position in the subject string where the current character +and the previous character do not both match \w or \W (i.e. one matches +\w and the other matches \W), or the start or end of the string if the +first or last character matches \w, respectively. In a UTF mode, the meanings +of \w and \W can be changed by setting the PCRE_UCP option. When this is +done, it also affects \b and \B. Neither PCRE nor Perl has a separate "start +of word" or "end of word" metasequence. However, whatever follows \b normally +determines which it is. For example, the fragment \ba matches "a" at the start +of a word. +</P> +<P> +The \A, \Z, and \z assertions differ from the traditional circumflex and +dollar (described in the next section) in that they only ever match at the very +start and end of the subject string, whatever options are set. Thus, they are +independent of multiline mode. These three assertions are not affected by the +PCRE_NOTBOL or PCRE_NOTEOL options, which affect only the behaviour of the +circumflex and dollar metacharacters. However, if the <i>startoffset</i> +argument of <b>pcre_exec()</b> is non-zero, indicating that matching is to start +at a point other than the beginning of the subject, \A can never match. The +difference between \Z and \z is that \Z matches before a newline at the end +of the string as well as at the very end, whereas \z matches only at the end. +</P> +<P> +The \G assertion is true only when the current matching position is at the +start point of the match, as specified by the <i>startoffset</i> argument of +<b>pcre_exec()</b>. It differs from \A when the value of <i>startoffset</i> is +non-zero. By calling <b>pcre_exec()</b> multiple times with appropriate +arguments, you can mimic Perl's /g option, and it is in this kind of +implementation where \G can be useful. +</P> +<P> +Note, however, that PCRE's interpretation of \G, as the start of the current +match, is subtly different from Perl's, which defines it as the end of the +previous match. In Perl, these can be different when the previously matched +string was empty. Because PCRE does just one match at a time, it cannot +reproduce this behaviour. +</P> +<P> +If all the alternatives of a pattern begin with \G, the expression is anchored +to the starting match position, and the "anchored" flag is set in the compiled +regular expression. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC6" href="#TOC1">CIRCUMFLEX AND DOLLAR</a><br> +<P> +The circumflex and dollar metacharacters are zero-width assertions. That is, +they test for a particular condition being true without consuming any +characters from the subject string. +</P> +<P> +Outside a character class, in the default matching mode, the circumflex +character is an assertion that is true only if the current matching point is at +the start of the subject string. If the <i>startoffset</i> argument of +<b>pcre_exec()</b> is non-zero, circumflex can never match if the PCRE_MULTILINE +option is unset. Inside a character class, circumflex has an entirely different +meaning +<a href="#characterclass">(see below).</a> +</P> +<P> +Circumflex need not be the first character of the pattern if a number of +alternatives are involved, but it should be the first thing in each alternative +in which it appears if the pattern is ever to match that branch. If all +possible alternatives start with a circumflex, that is, if the pattern is +constrained to match only at the start of the subject, it is said to be an +"anchored" pattern. (There are also other constructs that can cause a pattern +to be anchored.) +</P> +<P> +The dollar character is an assertion that is true only if the current matching +point is at the end of the subject string, or immediately before a newline at +the end of the string (by default). Note, however, that it does not actually +match the newline. Dollar need not be the last character of the pattern if a +number of alternatives are involved, but it should be the last item in any +branch in which it appears. Dollar has no special meaning in a character class. +</P> +<P> +The meaning of dollar can be changed so that it matches only at the very end of +the string, by setting the PCRE_DOLLAR_ENDONLY option at compile time. This +does not affect the \Z assertion. +</P> +<P> +The meanings of the circumflex and dollar characters are changed if the +PCRE_MULTILINE option is set. When this is the case, a circumflex matches +immediately after internal newlines as well as at the start of the subject +string. It does not match after a newline that ends the string. A dollar +matches before any newlines in the string, as well as at the very end, when +PCRE_MULTILINE is set. When newline is specified as the two-character +sequence CRLF, isolated CR and LF characters do not indicate newlines. +</P> +<P> +For example, the pattern /^abc$/ matches the subject string "def\nabc" (where +\n represents a newline) in multiline mode, but not otherwise. Consequently, +patterns that are anchored in single line mode because all branches start with +^ are not anchored in multiline mode, and a match for circumflex is possible +when the <i>startoffset</i> argument of <b>pcre_exec()</b> is non-zero. The +PCRE_DOLLAR_ENDONLY option is ignored if PCRE_MULTILINE is set. +</P> +<P> +Note that the sequences \A, \Z, and \z can be used to match the start and +end of the subject in both modes, and if all branches of a pattern start with +\A it is always anchored, whether or not PCRE_MULTILINE is set. +<a name="fullstopdot"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC7" href="#TOC1">FULL STOP (PERIOD, DOT) AND \N</a><br> +<P> +Outside a character class, a dot in the pattern matches any one character in +the subject string except (by default) a character that signifies the end of a +line. +</P> +<P> +When a line ending is defined as a single character, dot never matches that +character; when the two-character sequence CRLF is used, dot does not match CR +if it is immediately followed by LF, but otherwise it matches all characters +(including isolated CRs and LFs). When any Unicode line endings are being +recognized, dot does not match CR or LF or any of the other line ending +characters. +</P> +<P> +The behaviour of dot with regard to newlines can be changed. If the PCRE_DOTALL +option is set, a dot matches any one character, without exception. If the +two-character sequence CRLF is present in the subject string, it takes two dots +to match it. +</P> +<P> +The handling of dot is entirely independent of the handling of circumflex and +dollar, the only relationship being that they both involve newlines. Dot has no +special meaning in a character class. +</P> +<P> +The escape sequence \N behaves like a dot, except that it is not affected by +the PCRE_DOTALL option. In other words, it matches any character except one +that signifies the end of a line. Perl also uses \N to match characters by +name; PCRE does not support this. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC8" href="#TOC1">MATCHING A SINGLE DATA UNIT</a><br> +<P> +Outside a character class, the escape sequence \C matches any one data unit, +whether or not a UTF mode is set. In the 8-bit library, one data unit is one +byte; in the 16-bit library it is a 16-bit unit; in the 32-bit library it is +a 32-bit unit. Unlike a dot, \C always +matches line-ending characters. The feature is provided in Perl in order to +match individual bytes in UTF-8 mode, but it is unclear how it can usefully be +used. Because \C breaks up characters into individual data units, matching one +unit with \C in a UTF mode means that the rest of the string may start with a +malformed UTF character. This has undefined results, because PCRE assumes that +it is dealing with valid UTF strings (and by default it checks this at the +start of processing unless the PCRE_NO_UTF8_CHECK, PCRE_NO_UTF16_CHECK or +PCRE_NO_UTF32_CHECK option is used). +</P> +<P> +PCRE does not allow \C to appear in lookbehind assertions +<a href="#lookbehind">(described below)</a> +in a UTF mode, because this would make it impossible to calculate the length of +the lookbehind. +</P> +<P> +In general, the \C escape sequence is best avoided. However, one +way of using it that avoids the problem of malformed UTF characters is to use a +lookahead to check the length of the next character, as in this pattern, which +could be used with a UTF-8 string (ignore white space and line breaks): +<pre> + (?| (?=[\x00-\x7f])(\C) | + (?=[\x80-\x{7ff}])(\C)(\C) | + (?=[\x{800}-\x{ffff}])(\C)(\C)(\C) | + (?=[\x{10000}-\x{1fffff}])(\C)(\C)(\C)(\C)) +</pre> +A group that starts with (?| resets the capturing parentheses numbers in each +alternative (see +<a href="#dupsubpatternnumber">"Duplicate Subpattern Numbers"</a> +below). The assertions at the start of each branch check the next UTF-8 +character for values whose encoding uses 1, 2, 3, or 4 bytes, respectively. The +character's individual bytes are then captured by the appropriate number of +groups. +<a name="characterclass"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC9" href="#TOC1">SQUARE BRACKETS AND CHARACTER CLASSES</a><br> +<P> +An opening square bracket introduces a character class, terminated by a closing +square bracket. A closing square bracket on its own is not special by default. +However, if the PCRE_JAVASCRIPT_COMPAT option is set, a lone closing square +bracket causes a compile-time error. If a closing square bracket is required as +a member of the class, it should be the first data character in the class +(after an initial circumflex, if present) or escaped with a backslash. +</P> +<P> +A character class matches a single character in the subject. In a UTF mode, the +character may be more than one data unit long. A matched character must be in +the set of characters defined by the class, unless the first character in the +class definition is a circumflex, in which case the subject character must not +be in the set defined by the class. If a circumflex is actually required as a +member of the class, ensure it is not the first character, or escape it with a +backslash. +</P> +<P> +For example, the character class [aeiou] matches any lower case vowel, while +[^aeiou] matches any character that is not a lower case vowel. Note that a +circumflex is just a convenient notation for specifying the characters that +are in the class by enumerating those that are not. A class that starts with a +circumflex is not an assertion; it still consumes a character from the subject +string, and therefore it fails if the current pointer is at the end of the +string. +</P> +<P> +In UTF-8 (UTF-16, UTF-32) mode, characters with values greater than 255 (0xffff) +can be included in a class as a literal string of data units, or by using the +\x{ escaping mechanism. +</P> +<P> +When caseless matching is set, any letters in a class represent both their +upper case and lower case versions, so for example, a caseless [aeiou] matches +"A" as well as "a", and a caseless [^aeiou] does not match "A", whereas a +caseful version would. In a UTF mode, PCRE always understands the concept of +case for characters whose values are less than 128, so caseless matching is +always possible. For characters with higher values, the concept of case is +supported if PCRE is compiled with Unicode property support, but not otherwise. +If you want to use caseless matching in a UTF mode for characters 128 and +above, you must ensure that PCRE is compiled with Unicode property support as +well as with UTF support. +</P> +<P> +Characters that might indicate line breaks are never treated in any special way +when matching character classes, whatever line-ending sequence is in use, and +whatever setting of the PCRE_DOTALL and PCRE_MULTILINE options is used. A class +such as [^a] always matches one of these characters. +</P> +<P> +The minus (hyphen) character can be used to specify a range of characters in a +character class. For example, [d-m] matches any letter between d and m, +inclusive. If a minus character is required in a class, it must be escaped with +a backslash or appear in a position where it cannot be interpreted as +indicating a range, typically as the first or last character in the class, or +immediately after a range. For example, [b-d-z] matches letters in the range b +to d, a hyphen character, or z. +</P> +<P> +It is not possible to have the literal character "]" as the end character of a +range. A pattern such as [W-]46] is interpreted as a class of two characters +("W" and "-") followed by a literal string "46]", so it would match "W46]" or +"-46]". However, if the "]" is escaped with a backslash it is interpreted as +the end of range, so [W-\]46] is interpreted as a class containing a range +followed by two other characters. The octal or hexadecimal representation of +"]" can also be used to end a range. +</P> +<P> +An error is generated if a POSIX character class (see below) or an escape +sequence other than one that defines a single character appears at a point +where a range ending character is expected. For example, [z-\xff] is valid, +but [A-\d] and [A-[:digit:]] are not. +</P> +<P> +Ranges operate in the collating sequence of character values. They can also be +used for characters specified numerically, for example [\000-\037]. Ranges +can include any characters that are valid for the current mode. +</P> +<P> +If a range that includes letters is used when caseless matching is set, it +matches the letters in either case. For example, [W-c] is equivalent to +[][\\^_`wxyzabc], matched caselessly, and in a non-UTF mode, if character +tables for a French locale are in use, [\xc8-\xcb] matches accented E +characters in both cases. In UTF modes, PCRE supports the concept of case for +characters with values greater than 128 only when it is compiled with Unicode +property support. +</P> +<P> +The character escape sequences \d, \D, \h, \H, \p, \P, \s, \S, \v, +\V, \w, and \W may appear in a character class, and add the characters that +they match to the class. For example, [\dABCDEF] matches any hexadecimal +digit. In UTF modes, the PCRE_UCP option affects the meanings of \d, \s, \w +and their upper case partners, just as it does when they appear outside a +character class, as described in the section entitled +<a href="#genericchartypes">"Generic character types"</a> +above. The escape sequence \b has a different meaning inside a character +class; it matches the backspace character. The sequences \B, \N, \R, and \X +are not special inside a character class. Like any other unrecognized escape +sequences, they are treated as the literal characters "B", "N", "R", and "X" by +default, but cause an error if the PCRE_EXTRA option is set. +</P> +<P> +A circumflex can conveniently be used with the upper case character types to +specify a more restricted set of characters than the matching lower case type. +For example, the class [^\W_] matches any letter or digit, but not underscore, +whereas [\w] includes underscore. A positive character class should be read as +"something OR something OR ..." and a negative class as "NOT something AND NOT +something AND NOT ...". +</P> +<P> +The only metacharacters that are recognized in character classes are backslash, +hyphen (only where it can be interpreted as specifying a range), circumflex +(only at the start), opening square bracket (only when it can be interpreted as +introducing a POSIX class name, or for a special compatibility feature - see +the next two sections), and the terminating closing square bracket. However, +escaping other non-alphanumeric characters does no harm. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC10" href="#TOC1">POSIX CHARACTER CLASSES</a><br> +<P> +Perl supports the POSIX notation for character classes. This uses names +enclosed by [: and :] within the enclosing square brackets. PCRE also supports +this notation. For example, +<pre> + [01[:alpha:]%] +</pre> +matches "0", "1", any alphabetic character, or "%". The supported class names +are: +<pre> + alnum letters and digits + alpha letters + ascii character codes 0 - 127 + blank space or tab only + cntrl control characters + digit decimal digits (same as \d) + graph printing characters, excluding space + lower lower case letters + print printing characters, including space + punct printing characters, excluding letters and digits and space + space white space (the same as \s from PCRE 8.34) + upper upper case letters + word "word" characters (same as \w) + xdigit hexadecimal digits +</pre> +The default "space" characters are HT (9), LF (10), VT (11), FF (12), CR (13), +and space (32). If locale-specific matching is taking place, the list of space +characters may be different; there may be fewer or more of them. "Space" used +to be different to \s, which did not include VT, for Perl compatibility. +However, Perl changed at release 5.18, and PCRE followed at release 8.34. +"Space" and \s now match the same set of characters. +</P> +<P> +The name "word" is a Perl extension, and "blank" is a GNU extension from Perl +5.8. Another Perl extension is negation, which is indicated by a ^ character +after the colon. For example, +<pre> + [12[:^digit:]] +</pre> +matches "1", "2", or any non-digit. PCRE (and Perl) also recognize the POSIX +syntax [.ch.] and [=ch=] where "ch" is a "collating element", but these are not +supported, and an error is given if they are encountered. +</P> +<P> +By default, characters with values greater than 128 do not match any of the +POSIX character classes. However, if the PCRE_UCP option is passed to +<b>pcre_compile()</b>, some of the classes are changed so that Unicode character +properties are used. This is achieved by replacing certain POSIX classes by +other sequences, as follows: +<pre> + [:alnum:] becomes \p{Xan} + [:alpha:] becomes \p{L} + [:blank:] becomes \h + [:digit:] becomes \p{Nd} + [:lower:] becomes \p{Ll} + [:space:] becomes \p{Xps} + [:upper:] becomes \p{Lu} + [:word:] becomes \p{Xwd} +</pre> +Negated versions, such as [:^alpha:] use \P instead of \p. Three other POSIX +classes are handled specially in UCP mode: +</P> +<P> +[:graph:] +This matches characters that have glyphs that mark the page when printed. In +Unicode property terms, it matches all characters with the L, M, N, P, S, or Cf +properties, except for: +<pre> + U+061C Arabic Letter Mark + U+180E Mongolian Vowel Separator + U+2066 - U+2069 Various "isolate"s + +</PRE> +</P> +<P> +[:print:] +This matches the same characters as [:graph:] plus space characters that are +not controls, that is, characters with the Zs property. +</P> +<P> +[:punct:] +This matches all characters that have the Unicode P (punctuation) property, +plus those characters whose code points are less than 128 that have the S +(Symbol) property. +</P> +<P> +The other POSIX classes are unchanged, and match only characters with code +points less than 128. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC11" href="#TOC1">COMPATIBILITY FEATURE FOR WORD BOUNDARIES</a><br> +<P> +In the POSIX.2 compliant library that was included in 4.4BSD Unix, the ugly +syntax [[:<:]] and [[:>:]] is used for matching "start of word" and "end of +word". PCRE treats these items as follows: +<pre> + [[:<:]] is converted to \b(?=\w) + [[:>:]] is converted to \b(?<=\w) +</pre> +Only these exact character sequences are recognized. A sequence such as +[a[:<:]b] provokes error for an unrecognized POSIX class name. This support is +not compatible with Perl. It is provided to help migrations from other +environments, and is best not used in any new patterns. Note that \b matches +at the start and the end of a word (see +<a href="#smallassertions">"Simple assertions"</a> +above), and in a Perl-style pattern the preceding or following character +normally shows which is wanted, without the need for the assertions that are +used above in order to give exactly the POSIX behaviour. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC12" href="#TOC1">VERTICAL BAR</a><br> +<P> +Vertical bar characters are used to separate alternative patterns. For example, +the pattern +<pre> + gilbert|sullivan +</pre> +matches either "gilbert" or "sullivan". Any number of alternatives may appear, +and an empty alternative is permitted (matching the empty string). The matching +process tries each alternative in turn, from left to right, and the first one +that succeeds is used. If the alternatives are within a subpattern +<a href="#subpattern">(defined below),</a> +"succeeds" means matching the rest of the main pattern as well as the +alternative in the subpattern. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC13" href="#TOC1">INTERNAL OPTION SETTING</a><br> +<P> +The settings of the PCRE_CASELESS, PCRE_MULTILINE, PCRE_DOTALL, and +PCRE_EXTENDED options (which are Perl-compatible) can be changed from within +the pattern by a sequence of Perl option letters enclosed between "(?" and ")". +The option letters are +<pre> + i for PCRE_CASELESS + m for PCRE_MULTILINE + s for PCRE_DOTALL + x for PCRE_EXTENDED +</pre> +For example, (?im) sets caseless, multiline matching. It is also possible to +unset these options by preceding the letter with a hyphen, and a combined +setting and unsetting such as (?im-sx), which sets PCRE_CASELESS and +PCRE_MULTILINE while unsetting PCRE_DOTALL and PCRE_EXTENDED, is also +permitted. If a letter appears both before and after the hyphen, the option is +unset. +</P> +<P> +The PCRE-specific options PCRE_DUPNAMES, PCRE_UNGREEDY, and PCRE_EXTRA can be +changed in the same way as the Perl-compatible options by using the characters +J, U and X respectively. +</P> +<P> +When one of these option changes occurs at top level (that is, not inside +subpattern parentheses), the change applies to the remainder of the pattern +that follows. If the change is placed right at the start of a pattern, PCRE +extracts it into the global options (and it will therefore show up in data +extracted by the <b>pcre_fullinfo()</b> function). +</P> +<P> +An option change within a subpattern (see below for a description of +subpatterns) affects only that part of the subpattern that follows it, so +<pre> + (a(?i)b)c +</pre> +matches abc and aBc and no other strings (assuming PCRE_CASELESS is not used). +By this means, options can be made to have different settings in different +parts of the pattern. Any changes made in one alternative do carry on +into subsequent branches within the same subpattern. For example, +<pre> + (a(?i)b|c) +</pre> +matches "ab", "aB", "c", and "C", even though when matching "C" the first +branch is abandoned before the option setting. This is because the effects of +option settings happen at compile time. There would be some very weird +behaviour otherwise. +</P> +<P> +<b>Note:</b> There are other PCRE-specific options that can be set by the +application when the compiling or matching functions are called. In some cases +the pattern can contain special leading sequences such as (*CRLF) to override +what the application has set or what has been defaulted. Details are given in +the section entitled +<a href="#newlineseq">"Newline sequences"</a> +above. There are also the (*UTF8), (*UTF16),(*UTF32), and (*UCP) leading +sequences that can be used to set UTF and Unicode property modes; they are +equivalent to setting the PCRE_UTF8, PCRE_UTF16, PCRE_UTF32 and the PCRE_UCP +options, respectively. The (*UTF) sequence is a generic version that can be +used with any of the libraries. However, the application can set the +PCRE_NEVER_UTF option, which locks out the use of the (*UTF) sequences. +<a name="subpattern"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC14" href="#TOC1">SUBPATTERNS</a><br> +<P> +Subpatterns are delimited by parentheses (round brackets), which can be nested. +Turning part of a pattern into a subpattern does two things: +<br> +<br> +1. It localizes a set of alternatives. For example, the pattern +<pre> + cat(aract|erpillar|) +</pre> +matches "cataract", "caterpillar", or "cat". Without the parentheses, it would +match "cataract", "erpillar" or an empty string. +<br> +<br> +2. It sets up the subpattern as a capturing subpattern. This means that, when +the whole pattern matches, that portion of the subject string that matched the +subpattern is passed back to the caller via the <i>ovector</i> argument of the +matching function. (This applies only to the traditional matching functions; +the DFA matching functions do not support capturing.) +</P> +<P> +Opening parentheses are counted from left to right (starting from 1) to obtain +numbers for the capturing subpatterns. For example, if the string "the red +king" is matched against the pattern +<pre> + the ((red|white) (king|queen)) +</pre> +the captured substrings are "red king", "red", and "king", and are numbered 1, +2, and 3, respectively. +</P> +<P> +The fact that plain parentheses fulfil two functions is not always helpful. +There are often times when a grouping subpattern is required without a +capturing requirement. If an opening parenthesis is followed by a question mark +and a colon, the subpattern does not do any capturing, and is not counted when +computing the number of any subsequent capturing subpatterns. For example, if +the string "the white queen" is matched against the pattern +<pre> + the ((?:red|white) (king|queen)) +</pre> +the captured substrings are "white queen" and "queen", and are numbered 1 and +2. The maximum number of capturing subpatterns is 65535. +</P> +<P> +As a convenient shorthand, if any option settings are required at the start of +a non-capturing subpattern, the option letters may appear between the "?" and +the ":". Thus the two patterns +<pre> + (?i:saturday|sunday) + (?:(?i)saturday|sunday) +</pre> +match exactly the same set of strings. Because alternative branches are tried +from left to right, and options are not reset until the end of the subpattern +is reached, an option setting in one branch does affect subsequent branches, so +the above patterns match "SUNDAY" as well as "Saturday". +<a name="dupsubpatternnumber"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC15" href="#TOC1">DUPLICATE SUBPATTERN NUMBERS</a><br> +<P> +Perl 5.10 introduced a feature whereby each alternative in a subpattern uses +the same numbers for its capturing parentheses. Such a subpattern starts with +(?| and is itself a non-capturing subpattern. For example, consider this +pattern: +<pre> + (?|(Sat)ur|(Sun))day +</pre> +Because the two alternatives are inside a (?| group, both sets of capturing +parentheses are numbered one. Thus, when the pattern matches, you can look +at captured substring number one, whichever alternative matched. This construct +is useful when you want to capture part, but not all, of one of a number of +alternatives. Inside a (?| group, parentheses are numbered as usual, but the +number is reset at the start of each branch. The numbers of any capturing +parentheses that follow the subpattern start after the highest number used in +any branch. The following example is taken from the Perl documentation. The +numbers underneath show in which buffer the captured content will be stored. +<pre> + # before ---------------branch-reset----------- after + / ( a ) (?| x ( y ) z | (p (q) r) | (t) u (v) ) ( z ) /x + # 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 +</pre> +A back reference to a numbered subpattern uses the most recent value that is +set for that number by any subpattern. The following pattern matches "abcabc" +or "defdef": +<pre> + /(?|(abc)|(def))\1/ +</pre> +In contrast, a subroutine call to a numbered subpattern always refers to the +first one in the pattern with the given number. The following pattern matches +"abcabc" or "defabc": +<pre> + /(?|(abc)|(def))(?1)/ +</pre> +If a +<a href="#conditions">condition test</a> +for a subpattern's having matched refers to a non-unique number, the test is +true if any of the subpatterns of that number have matched. +</P> +<P> +An alternative approach to using this "branch reset" feature is to use +duplicate named subpatterns, as described in the next section. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC16" href="#TOC1">NAMED SUBPATTERNS</a><br> +<P> +Identifying capturing parentheses by number is simple, but it can be very hard +to keep track of the numbers in complicated regular expressions. Furthermore, +if an expression is modified, the numbers may change. To help with this +difficulty, PCRE supports the naming of subpatterns. This feature was not +added to Perl until release 5.10. Python had the feature earlier, and PCRE +introduced it at release 4.0, using the Python syntax. PCRE now supports both +the Perl and the Python syntax. Perl allows identically numbered subpatterns to +have different names, but PCRE does not. +</P> +<P> +In PCRE, a subpattern can be named in one of three ways: (?<name>...) or +(?'name'...) as in Perl, or (?P<name>...) as in Python. References to capturing +parentheses from other parts of the pattern, such as +<a href="#backreferences">back references,</a> +<a href="#recursion">recursion,</a> +and +<a href="#conditions">conditions,</a> +can be made by name as well as by number. +</P> +<P> +Names consist of up to 32 alphanumeric characters and underscores, but must +start with a non-digit. Named capturing parentheses are still allocated numbers +as well as names, exactly as if the names were not present. The PCRE API +provides function calls for extracting the name-to-number translation table +from a compiled pattern. There is also a convenience function for extracting a +captured substring by name. +</P> +<P> +By default, a name must be unique within a pattern, but it is possible to relax +this constraint by setting the PCRE_DUPNAMES option at compile time. (Duplicate +names are also always permitted for subpatterns with the same number, set up as +described in the previous section.) Duplicate names can be useful for patterns +where only one instance of the named parentheses can match. Suppose you want to +match the name of a weekday, either as a 3-letter abbreviation or as the full +name, and in both cases you want to extract the abbreviation. This pattern +(ignoring the line breaks) does the job: +<pre> + (?<DN>Mon|Fri|Sun)(?:day)?| + (?<DN>Tue)(?:sday)?| + (?<DN>Wed)(?:nesday)?| + (?<DN>Thu)(?:rsday)?| + (?<DN>Sat)(?:urday)? +</pre> +There are five capturing substrings, but only one is ever set after a match. +(An alternative way of solving this problem is to use a "branch reset" +subpattern, as described in the previous section.) +</P> +<P> +The convenience function for extracting the data by name returns the substring +for the first (and in this example, the only) subpattern of that name that +matched. This saves searching to find which numbered subpattern it was. +</P> +<P> +If you make a back reference to a non-unique named subpattern from elsewhere in +the pattern, the subpatterns to which the name refers are checked in the order +in which they appear in the overall pattern. The first one that is set is used +for the reference. For example, this pattern matches both "foofoo" and +"barbar" but not "foobar" or "barfoo": +<pre> + (?:(?<n>foo)|(?<n>bar))\k<n> + +</PRE> +</P> +<P> +If you make a subroutine call to a non-unique named subpattern, the one that +corresponds to the first occurrence of the name is used. In the absence of +duplicate numbers (see the previous section) this is the one with the lowest +number. +</P> +<P> +If you use a named reference in a condition +test (see the +<a href="#conditions">section about conditions</a> +below), either to check whether a subpattern has matched, or to check for +recursion, all subpatterns with the same name are tested. If the condition is +true for any one of them, the overall condition is true. This is the same +behaviour as testing by number. For further details of the interfaces for +handling named subpatterns, see the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +documentation. +</P> +<P> +<b>Warning:</b> You cannot use different names to distinguish between two +subpatterns with the same number because PCRE uses only the numbers when +matching. For this reason, an error is given at compile time if different names +are given to subpatterns with the same number. However, you can always give the +same name to subpatterns with the same number, even when PCRE_DUPNAMES is not +set. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC17" href="#TOC1">REPETITION</a><br> +<P> +Repetition is specified by quantifiers, which can follow any of the following +items: +<pre> + a literal data character + the dot metacharacter + the \C escape sequence + the \X escape sequence + the \R escape sequence + an escape such as \d or \pL that matches a single character + a character class + a back reference (see next section) + a parenthesized subpattern (including assertions) + a subroutine call to a subpattern (recursive or otherwise) +</pre> +The general repetition quantifier specifies a minimum and maximum number of +permitted matches, by giving the two numbers in curly brackets (braces), +separated by a comma. The numbers must be less than 65536, and the first must +be less than or equal to the second. For example: +<pre> + z{2,4} +</pre> +matches "zz", "zzz", or "zzzz". A closing brace on its own is not a special +character. If the second number is omitted, but the comma is present, there is +no upper limit; if the second number and the comma are both omitted, the +quantifier specifies an exact number of required matches. Thus +<pre> + [aeiou]{3,} +</pre> +matches at least 3 successive vowels, but may match many more, while +<pre> + \d{8} +</pre> +matches exactly 8 digits. An opening curly bracket that appears in a position +where a quantifier is not allowed, or one that does not match the syntax of a +quantifier, is taken as a literal character. For example, {,6} is not a +quantifier, but a literal string of four characters. +</P> +<P> +In UTF modes, quantifiers apply to characters rather than to individual data +units. Thus, for example, \x{100}{2} matches two characters, each of +which is represented by a two-byte sequence in a UTF-8 string. Similarly, +\X{3} matches three Unicode extended grapheme clusters, each of which may be +several data units long (and they may be of different lengths). +</P> +<P> +The quantifier {0} is permitted, causing the expression to behave as if the +previous item and the quantifier were not present. This may be useful for +subpatterns that are referenced as +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">subroutines</a> +from elsewhere in the pattern (but see also the section entitled +<a href="#subdefine">"Defining subpatterns for use by reference only"</a> +below). Items other than subpatterns that have a {0} quantifier are omitted +from the compiled pattern. +</P> +<P> +For convenience, the three most common quantifiers have single-character +abbreviations: +<pre> + * is equivalent to {0,} + + is equivalent to {1,} + ? is equivalent to {0,1} +</pre> +It is possible to construct infinite loops by following a subpattern that can +match no characters with a quantifier that has no upper limit, for example: +<pre> + (a?)* +</pre> +Earlier versions of Perl and PCRE used to give an error at compile time for +such patterns. However, because there are cases where this can be useful, such +patterns are now accepted, but if any repetition of the subpattern does in fact +match no characters, the loop is forcibly broken. +</P> +<P> +By default, the quantifiers are "greedy", that is, they match as much as +possible (up to the maximum number of permitted times), without causing the +rest of the pattern to fail. The classic example of where this gives problems +is in trying to match comments in C programs. These appear between /* and */ +and within the comment, individual * and / characters may appear. An attempt to +match C comments by applying the pattern +<pre> + /\*.*\*/ +</pre> +to the string +<pre> + /* first comment */ not comment /* second comment */ +</pre> +fails, because it matches the entire string owing to the greediness of the .* +item. +</P> +<P> +However, if a quantifier is followed by a question mark, it ceases to be +greedy, and instead matches the minimum number of times possible, so the +pattern +<pre> + /\*.*?\*/ +</pre> +does the right thing with the C comments. The meaning of the various +quantifiers is not otherwise changed, just the preferred number of matches. +Do not confuse this use of question mark with its use as a quantifier in its +own right. Because it has two uses, it can sometimes appear doubled, as in +<pre> + \d??\d +</pre> +which matches one digit by preference, but can match two if that is the only +way the rest of the pattern matches. +</P> +<P> +If the PCRE_UNGREEDY option is set (an option that is not available in Perl), +the quantifiers are not greedy by default, but individual ones can be made +greedy by following them with a question mark. In other words, it inverts the +default behaviour. +</P> +<P> +When a parenthesized subpattern is quantified with a minimum repeat count that +is greater than 1 or with a limited maximum, more memory is required for the +compiled pattern, in proportion to the size of the minimum or maximum. +</P> +<P> +If a pattern starts with .* or .{0,} and the PCRE_DOTALL option (equivalent +to Perl's /s) is set, thus allowing the dot to match newlines, the pattern is +implicitly anchored, because whatever follows will be tried against every +character position in the subject string, so there is no point in retrying the +overall match at any position after the first. PCRE normally treats such a +pattern as though it were preceded by \A. +</P> +<P> +In cases where it is known that the subject string contains no newlines, it is +worth setting PCRE_DOTALL in order to obtain this optimization, or +alternatively using ^ to indicate anchoring explicitly. +</P> +<P> +However, there are some cases where the optimization cannot be used. When .* +is inside capturing parentheses that are the subject of a back reference +elsewhere in the pattern, a match at the start may fail where a later one +succeeds. Consider, for example: +<pre> + (.*)abc\1 +</pre> +If the subject is "xyz123abc123" the match point is the fourth character. For +this reason, such a pattern is not implicitly anchored. +</P> +<P> +Another case where implicit anchoring is not applied is when the leading .* is +inside an atomic group. Once again, a match at the start may fail where a later +one succeeds. Consider this pattern: +<pre> + (?>.*?a)b +</pre> +It matches "ab" in the subject "aab". The use of the backtracking control verbs +(*PRUNE) and (*SKIP) also disable this optimization. +</P> +<P> +When a capturing subpattern is repeated, the value captured is the substring +that matched the final iteration. For example, after +<pre> + (tweedle[dume]{3}\s*)+ +</pre> +has matched "tweedledum tweedledee" the value of the captured substring is +"tweedledee". However, if there are nested capturing subpatterns, the +corresponding captured values may have been set in previous iterations. For +example, after +<pre> + /(a|(b))+/ +</pre> +matches "aba" the value of the second captured substring is "b". +<a name="atomicgroup"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC18" href="#TOC1">ATOMIC GROUPING AND POSSESSIVE QUANTIFIERS</a><br> +<P> +With both maximizing ("greedy") and minimizing ("ungreedy" or "lazy") +repetition, failure of what follows normally causes the repeated item to be +re-evaluated to see if a different number of repeats allows the rest of the +pattern to match. Sometimes it is useful to prevent this, either to change the +nature of the match, or to cause it fail earlier than it otherwise might, when +the author of the pattern knows there is no point in carrying on. +</P> +<P> +Consider, for example, the pattern \d+foo when applied to the subject line +<pre> + 123456bar +</pre> +After matching all 6 digits and then failing to match "foo", the normal +action of the matcher is to try again with only 5 digits matching the \d+ +item, and then with 4, and so on, before ultimately failing. "Atomic grouping" +(a term taken from Jeffrey Friedl's book) provides the means for specifying +that once a subpattern has matched, it is not to be re-evaluated in this way. +</P> +<P> +If we use atomic grouping for the previous example, the matcher gives up +immediately on failing to match "foo" the first time. The notation is a kind of +special parenthesis, starting with (?> as in this example: +<pre> + (?>\d+)foo +</pre> +This kind of parenthesis "locks up" the part of the pattern it contains once +it has matched, and a failure further into the pattern is prevented from +backtracking into it. Backtracking past it to previous items, however, works as +normal. +</P> +<P> +An alternative description is that a subpattern of this type matches the string +of characters that an identical standalone pattern would match, if anchored at +the current point in the subject string. +</P> +<P> +Atomic grouping subpatterns are not capturing subpatterns. Simple cases such as +the above example can be thought of as a maximizing repeat that must swallow +everything it can. So, while both \d+ and \d+? are prepared to adjust the +number of digits they match in order to make the rest of the pattern match, +(?>\d+) can only match an entire sequence of digits. +</P> +<P> +Atomic groups in general can of course contain arbitrarily complicated +subpatterns, and can be nested. However, when the subpattern for an atomic +group is just a single repeated item, as in the example above, a simpler +notation, called a "possessive quantifier" can be used. This consists of an +additional + character following a quantifier. Using this notation, the +previous example can be rewritten as +<pre> + \d++foo +</pre> +Note that a possessive quantifier can be used with an entire group, for +example: +<pre> + (abc|xyz){2,3}+ +</pre> +Possessive quantifiers are always greedy; the setting of the PCRE_UNGREEDY +option is ignored. They are a convenient notation for the simpler forms of +atomic group. However, there is no difference in the meaning of a possessive +quantifier and the equivalent atomic group, though there may be a performance +difference; possessive quantifiers should be slightly faster. +</P> +<P> +The possessive quantifier syntax is an extension to the Perl 5.8 syntax. +Jeffrey Friedl originated the idea (and the name) in the first edition of his +book. Mike McCloskey liked it, so implemented it when he built Sun's Java +package, and PCRE copied it from there. It ultimately found its way into Perl +at release 5.10. +</P> +<P> +PCRE has an optimization that automatically "possessifies" certain simple +pattern constructs. For example, the sequence A+B is treated as A++B because +there is no point in backtracking into a sequence of A's when B must follow. +</P> +<P> +When a pattern contains an unlimited repeat inside a subpattern that can itself +be repeated an unlimited number of times, the use of an atomic group is the +only way to avoid some failing matches taking a very long time indeed. The +pattern +<pre> + (\D+|<\d+>)*[!?] +</pre> +matches an unlimited number of substrings that either consist of non-digits, or +digits enclosed in <>, followed by either ! or ?. When it matches, it runs +quickly. However, if it is applied to +<pre> + aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +</pre> +it takes a long time before reporting failure. This is because the string can +be divided between the internal \D+ repeat and the external * repeat in a +large number of ways, and all have to be tried. (The example uses [!?] rather +than a single character at the end, because both PCRE and Perl have an +optimization that allows for fast failure when a single character is used. They +remember the last single character that is required for a match, and fail early +if it is not present in the string.) If the pattern is changed so that it uses +an atomic group, like this: +<pre> + ((?>\D+)|<\d+>)*[!?] +</pre> +sequences of non-digits cannot be broken, and failure happens quickly. +<a name="backreferences"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC19" href="#TOC1">BACK REFERENCES</a><br> +<P> +Outside a character class, a backslash followed by a digit greater than 0 (and +possibly further digits) is a back reference to a capturing subpattern earlier +(that is, to its left) in the pattern, provided there have been that many +previous capturing left parentheses. +</P> +<P> +However, if the decimal number following the backslash is less than 10, it is +always taken as a back reference, and causes an error only if there are not +that many capturing left parentheses in the entire pattern. In other words, the +parentheses that are referenced need not be to the left of the reference for +numbers less than 10. A "forward back reference" of this type can make sense +when a repetition is involved and the subpattern to the right has participated +in an earlier iteration. +</P> +<P> +It is not possible to have a numerical "forward back reference" to a subpattern +whose number is 10 or more using this syntax because a sequence such as \50 is +interpreted as a character defined in octal. See the subsection entitled +"Non-printing characters" +<a href="#digitsafterbackslash">above</a> +for further details of the handling of digits following a backslash. There is +no such problem when named parentheses are used. A back reference to any +subpattern is possible using named parentheses (see below). +</P> +<P> +Another way of avoiding the ambiguity inherent in the use of digits following a +backslash is to use the \g escape sequence. This escape must be followed by an +unsigned number or a negative number, optionally enclosed in braces. These +examples are all identical: +<pre> + (ring), \1 + (ring), \g1 + (ring), \g{1} +</pre> +An unsigned number specifies an absolute reference without the ambiguity that +is present in the older syntax. It is also useful when literal digits follow +the reference. A negative number is a relative reference. Consider this +example: +<pre> + (abc(def)ghi)\g{-1} +</pre> +The sequence \g{-1} is a reference to the most recently started capturing +subpattern before \g, that is, is it equivalent to \2 in this example. +Similarly, \g{-2} would be equivalent to \1. The use of relative references +can be helpful in long patterns, and also in patterns that are created by +joining together fragments that contain references within themselves. +</P> +<P> +A back reference matches whatever actually matched the capturing subpattern in +the current subject string, rather than anything matching the subpattern +itself (see +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">"Subpatterns as subroutines"</a> +below for a way of doing that). So the pattern +<pre> + (sens|respons)e and \1ibility +</pre> +matches "sense and sensibility" and "response and responsibility", but not +"sense and responsibility". If caseful matching is in force at the time of the +back reference, the case of letters is relevant. For example, +<pre> + ((?i)rah)\s+\1 +</pre> +matches "rah rah" and "RAH RAH", but not "RAH rah", even though the original +capturing subpattern is matched caselessly. +</P> +<P> +There are several different ways of writing back references to named +subpatterns. The .NET syntax \k{name} and the Perl syntax \k<name> or +\k'name' are supported, as is the Python syntax (?P=name). Perl 5.10's unified +back reference syntax, in which \g can be used for both numeric and named +references, is also supported. We could rewrite the above example in any of +the following ways: +<pre> + (?<p1>(?i)rah)\s+\k<p1> + (?'p1'(?i)rah)\s+\k{p1} + (?P<p1>(?i)rah)\s+(?P=p1) + (?<p1>(?i)rah)\s+\g{p1} +</pre> +A subpattern that is referenced by name may appear in the pattern before or +after the reference. +</P> +<P> +There may be more than one back reference to the same subpattern. If a +subpattern has not actually been used in a particular match, any back +references to it always fail by default. For example, the pattern +<pre> + (a|(bc))\2 +</pre> +always fails if it starts to match "a" rather than "bc". However, if the +PCRE_JAVASCRIPT_COMPAT option is set at compile time, a back reference to an +unset value matches an empty string. +</P> +<P> +Because there may be many capturing parentheses in a pattern, all digits +following a backslash are taken as part of a potential back reference number. +If the pattern continues with a digit character, some delimiter must be used to +terminate the back reference. If the PCRE_EXTENDED option is set, this can be +white space. Otherwise, the \g{ syntax or an empty comment (see +<a href="#comments">"Comments"</a> +below) can be used. +</P> +<br><b> +Recursive back references +</b><br> +<P> +A back reference that occurs inside the parentheses to which it refers fails +when the subpattern is first used, so, for example, (a\1) never matches. +However, such references can be useful inside repeated subpatterns. For +example, the pattern +<pre> + (a|b\1)+ +</pre> +matches any number of "a"s and also "aba", "ababbaa" etc. At each iteration of +the subpattern, the back reference matches the character string corresponding +to the previous iteration. In order for this to work, the pattern must be such +that the first iteration does not need to match the back reference. This can be +done using alternation, as in the example above, or by a quantifier with a +minimum of zero. +</P> +<P> +Back references of this type cause the group that they reference to be treated +as an +<a href="#atomicgroup">atomic group.</a> +Once the whole group has been matched, a subsequent matching failure cannot +cause backtracking into the middle of the group. +<a name="bigassertions"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC20" href="#TOC1">ASSERTIONS</a><br> +<P> +An assertion is a test on the characters following or preceding the current +matching point that does not actually consume any characters. The simple +assertions coded as \b, \B, \A, \G, \Z, \z, ^ and $ are described +<a href="#smallassertions">above.</a> +</P> +<P> +More complicated assertions are coded as subpatterns. There are two kinds: +those that look ahead of the current position in the subject string, and those +that look behind it. An assertion subpattern is matched in the normal way, +except that it does not cause the current matching position to be changed. +</P> +<P> +Assertion subpatterns are not capturing subpatterns. If such an assertion +contains capturing subpatterns within it, these are counted for the purposes of +numbering the capturing subpatterns in the whole pattern. However, substring +capturing is carried out only for positive assertions. (Perl sometimes, but not +always, does do capturing in negative assertions.) +</P> +<P> +For compatibility with Perl, assertion subpatterns may be repeated; though +it makes no sense to assert the same thing several times, the side effect of +capturing parentheses may occasionally be useful. In practice, there only three +cases: +<br> +<br> +(1) If the quantifier is {0}, the assertion is never obeyed during matching. +However, it may contain internal capturing parenthesized groups that are called +from elsewhere via the +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">subroutine mechanism.</a> +<br> +<br> +(2) If quantifier is {0,n} where n is greater than zero, it is treated as if it +were {0,1}. At run time, the rest of the pattern match is tried with and +without the assertion, the order depending on the greediness of the quantifier. +<br> +<br> +(3) If the minimum repetition is greater than zero, the quantifier is ignored. +The assertion is obeyed just once when encountered during matching. +</P> +<br><b> +Lookahead assertions +</b><br> +<P> +Lookahead assertions start with (?= for positive assertions and (?! for +negative assertions. For example, +<pre> + \w+(?=;) +</pre> +matches a word followed by a semicolon, but does not include the semicolon in +the match, and +<pre> + foo(?!bar) +</pre> +matches any occurrence of "foo" that is not followed by "bar". Note that the +apparently similar pattern +<pre> + (?!foo)bar +</pre> +does not find an occurrence of "bar" that is preceded by something other than +"foo"; it finds any occurrence of "bar" whatsoever, because the assertion +(?!foo) is always true when the next three characters are "bar". A +lookbehind assertion is needed to achieve the other effect. +</P> +<P> +If you want to force a matching failure at some point in a pattern, the most +convenient way to do it is with (?!) because an empty string always matches, so +an assertion that requires there not to be an empty string must always fail. +The backtracking control verb (*FAIL) or (*F) is a synonym for (?!). +<a name="lookbehind"></a></P> +<br><b> +Lookbehind assertions +</b><br> +<P> +Lookbehind assertions start with (?<= for positive assertions and (?<! for +negative assertions. For example, +<pre> + (?<!foo)bar +</pre> +does find an occurrence of "bar" that is not preceded by "foo". The contents of +a lookbehind assertion are restricted such that all the strings it matches must +have a fixed length. However, if there are several top-level alternatives, they +do not all have to have the same fixed length. Thus +<pre> + (?<=bullock|donkey) +</pre> +is permitted, but +<pre> + (?<!dogs?|cats?) +</pre> +causes an error at compile time. Branches that match different length strings +are permitted only at the top level of a lookbehind assertion. This is an +extension compared with Perl, which requires all branches to match the same +length of string. An assertion such as +<pre> + (?<=ab(c|de)) +</pre> +is not permitted, because its single top-level branch can match two different +lengths, but it is acceptable to PCRE if rewritten to use two top-level +branches: +<pre> + (?<=abc|abde) +</pre> +In some cases, the escape sequence \K +<a href="#resetmatchstart">(see above)</a> +can be used instead of a lookbehind assertion to get round the fixed-length +restriction. +</P> +<P> +The implementation of lookbehind assertions is, for each alternative, to +temporarily move the current position back by the fixed length and then try to +match. If there are insufficient characters before the current position, the +assertion fails. +</P> +<P> +In a UTF mode, PCRE does not allow the \C escape (which matches a single data +unit even in a UTF mode) to appear in lookbehind assertions, because it makes +it impossible to calculate the length of the lookbehind. The \X and \R +escapes, which can match different numbers of data units, are also not +permitted. +</P> +<P> +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">"Subroutine"</a> +calls (see below) such as (?2) or (?&X) are permitted in lookbehinds, as long +as the subpattern matches a fixed-length string. +<a href="#recursion">Recursion,</a> +however, is not supported. +</P> +<P> +Possessive quantifiers can be used in conjunction with lookbehind assertions to +specify efficient matching of fixed-length strings at the end of subject +strings. Consider a simple pattern such as +<pre> + abcd$ +</pre> +when applied to a long string that does not match. Because matching proceeds +from left to right, PCRE will look for each "a" in the subject and then see if +what follows matches the rest of the pattern. If the pattern is specified as +<pre> + ^.*abcd$ +</pre> +the initial .* matches the entire string at first, but when this fails (because +there is no following "a"), it backtracks to match all but the last character, +then all but the last two characters, and so on. Once again the search for "a" +covers the entire string, from right to left, so we are no better off. However, +if the pattern is written as +<pre> + ^.*+(?<=abcd) +</pre> +there can be no backtracking for the .*+ item; it can match only the entire +string. The subsequent lookbehind assertion does a single test on the last four +characters. If it fails, the match fails immediately. For long strings, this +approach makes a significant difference to the processing time. +</P> +<br><b> +Using multiple assertions +</b><br> +<P> +Several assertions (of any sort) may occur in succession. For example, +<pre> + (?<=\d{3})(?<!999)foo +</pre> +matches "foo" preceded by three digits that are not "999". Notice that each of +the assertions is applied independently at the same point in the subject +string. First there is a check that the previous three characters are all +digits, and then there is a check that the same three characters are not "999". +This pattern does <i>not</i> match "foo" preceded by six characters, the first +of which are digits and the last three of which are not "999". For example, it +doesn't match "123abcfoo". A pattern to do that is +<pre> + (?<=\d{3}...)(?<!999)foo +</pre> +This time the first assertion looks at the preceding six characters, checking +that the first three are digits, and then the second assertion checks that the +preceding three characters are not "999". +</P> +<P> +Assertions can be nested in any combination. For example, +<pre> + (?<=(?<!foo)bar)baz +</pre> +matches an occurrence of "baz" that is preceded by "bar" which in turn is not +preceded by "foo", while +<pre> + (?<=\d{3}(?!999)...)foo +</pre> +is another pattern that matches "foo" preceded by three digits and any three +characters that are not "999". +<a name="conditions"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC21" href="#TOC1">CONDITIONAL SUBPATTERNS</a><br> +<P> +It is possible to cause the matching process to obey a subpattern +conditionally or to choose between two alternative subpatterns, depending on +the result of an assertion, or whether a specific capturing subpattern has +already been matched. The two possible forms of conditional subpattern are: +<pre> + (?(condition)yes-pattern) + (?(condition)yes-pattern|no-pattern) +</pre> +If the condition is satisfied, the yes-pattern is used; otherwise the +no-pattern (if present) is used. If there are more than two alternatives in the +subpattern, a compile-time error occurs. Each of the two alternatives may +itself contain nested subpatterns of any form, including conditional +subpatterns; the restriction to two alternatives applies only at the level of +the condition. This pattern fragment is an example where the alternatives are +complex: +<pre> + (?(1) (A|B|C) | (D | (?(2)E|F) | E) ) + +</PRE> +</P> +<P> +There are four kinds of condition: references to subpatterns, references to +recursion, a pseudo-condition called DEFINE, and assertions. +</P> +<br><b> +Checking for a used subpattern by number +</b><br> +<P> +If the text between the parentheses consists of a sequence of digits, the +condition is true if a capturing subpattern of that number has previously +matched. If there is more than one capturing subpattern with the same number +(see the earlier +<a href="#recursion">section about duplicate subpattern numbers),</a> +the condition is true if any of them have matched. An alternative notation is +to precede the digits with a plus or minus sign. In this case, the subpattern +number is relative rather than absolute. The most recently opened parentheses +can be referenced by (?(-1), the next most recent by (?(-2), and so on. Inside +loops it can also make sense to refer to subsequent groups. The next +parentheses to be opened can be referenced as (?(+1), and so on. (The value +zero in any of these forms is not used; it provokes a compile-time error.) +</P> +<P> +Consider the following pattern, which contains non-significant white space to +make it more readable (assume the PCRE_EXTENDED option) and to divide it into +three parts for ease of discussion: +<pre> + ( \( )? [^()]+ (?(1) \) ) +</pre> +The first part matches an optional opening parenthesis, and if that +character is present, sets it as the first captured substring. The second part +matches one or more characters that are not parentheses. The third part is a +conditional subpattern that tests whether or not the first set of parentheses +matched. If they did, that is, if subject started with an opening parenthesis, +the condition is true, and so the yes-pattern is executed and a closing +parenthesis is required. Otherwise, since no-pattern is not present, the +subpattern matches nothing. In other words, this pattern matches a sequence of +non-parentheses, optionally enclosed in parentheses. +</P> +<P> +If you were embedding this pattern in a larger one, you could use a relative +reference: +<pre> + ...other stuff... ( \( )? [^()]+ (?(-1) \) ) ... +</pre> +This makes the fragment independent of the parentheses in the larger pattern. +</P> +<br><b> +Checking for a used subpattern by name +</b><br> +<P> +Perl uses the syntax (?(<name>)...) or (?('name')...) to test for a used +subpattern by name. For compatibility with earlier versions of PCRE, which had +this facility before Perl, the syntax (?(name)...) is also recognized. +</P> +<P> +Rewriting the above example to use a named subpattern gives this: +<pre> + (?<OPEN> \( )? [^()]+ (?(<OPEN>) \) ) +</pre> +If the name used in a condition of this kind is a duplicate, the test is +applied to all subpatterns of the same name, and is true if any one of them has +matched. +</P> +<br><b> +Checking for pattern recursion +</b><br> +<P> +If the condition is the string (R), and there is no subpattern with the name R, +the condition is true if a recursive call to the whole pattern or any +subpattern has been made. If digits or a name preceded by ampersand follow the +letter R, for example: +<pre> + (?(R3)...) or (?(R&name)...) +</pre> +the condition is true if the most recent recursion is into a subpattern whose +number or name is given. This condition does not check the entire recursion +stack. If the name used in a condition of this kind is a duplicate, the test is +applied to all subpatterns of the same name, and is true if any one of them is +the most recent recursion. +</P> +<P> +At "top level", all these recursion test conditions are false. +<a href="#recursion">The syntax for recursive patterns</a> +is described below. +<a name="subdefine"></a></P> +<br><b> +Defining subpatterns for use by reference only +</b><br> +<P> +If the condition is the string (DEFINE), and there is no subpattern with the +name DEFINE, the condition is always false. In this case, there may be only one +alternative in the subpattern. It is always skipped if control reaches this +point in the pattern; the idea of DEFINE is that it can be used to define +subroutines that can be referenced from elsewhere. (The use of +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">subroutines</a> +is described below.) For example, a pattern to match an IPv4 address such as +"192.168.23.245" could be written like this (ignore white space and line +breaks): +<pre> + (?(DEFINE) (?<byte> 2[0-4]\d | 25[0-5] | 1\d\d | [1-9]?\d) ) + \b (?&byte) (\.(?&byte)){3} \b +</pre> +The first part of the pattern is a DEFINE group inside which a another group +named "byte" is defined. This matches an individual component of an IPv4 +address (a number less than 256). When matching takes place, this part of the +pattern is skipped because DEFINE acts like a false condition. The rest of the +pattern uses references to the named group to match the four dot-separated +components of an IPv4 address, insisting on a word boundary at each end. +</P> +<br><b> +Assertion conditions +</b><br> +<P> +If the condition is not in any of the above formats, it must be an assertion. +This may be a positive or negative lookahead or lookbehind assertion. Consider +this pattern, again containing non-significant white space, and with the two +alternatives on the second line: +<pre> + (?(?=[^a-z]*[a-z]) + \d{2}-[a-z]{3}-\d{2} | \d{2}-\d{2}-\d{2} ) +</pre> +The condition is a positive lookahead assertion that matches an optional +sequence of non-letters followed by a letter. In other words, it tests for the +presence of at least one letter in the subject. If a letter is found, the +subject is matched against the first alternative; otherwise it is matched +against the second. This pattern matches strings in one of the two forms +dd-aaa-dd or dd-dd-dd, where aaa are letters and dd are digits. +<a name="comments"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC22" href="#TOC1">COMMENTS</a><br> +<P> +There are two ways of including comments in patterns that are processed by +PCRE. In both cases, the start of the comment must not be in a character class, +nor in the middle of any other sequence of related characters such as (?: or a +subpattern name or number. The characters that make up a comment play no part +in the pattern matching. +</P> +<P> +The sequence (?# marks the start of a comment that continues up to the next +closing parenthesis. Nested parentheses are not permitted. If the PCRE_EXTENDED +option is set, an unescaped # character also introduces a comment, which in +this case continues to immediately after the next newline character or +character sequence in the pattern. Which characters are interpreted as newlines +is controlled by the options passed to a compiling function or by a special +sequence at the start of the pattern, as described in the section entitled +<a href="#newlines">"Newline conventions"</a> +above. Note that the end of this type of comment is a literal newline sequence +in the pattern; escape sequences that happen to represent a newline do not +count. For example, consider this pattern when PCRE_EXTENDED is set, and the +default newline convention is in force: +<pre> + abc #comment \n still comment +</pre> +On encountering the # character, <b>pcre_compile()</b> skips along, looking for +a newline in the pattern. The sequence \n is still literal at this stage, so +it does not terminate the comment. Only an actual character with the code value +0x0a (the default newline) does so. +<a name="recursion"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC23" href="#TOC1">RECURSIVE PATTERNS</a><br> +<P> +Consider the problem of matching a string in parentheses, allowing for +unlimited nested parentheses. Without the use of recursion, the best that can +be done is to use a pattern that matches up to some fixed depth of nesting. It +is not possible to handle an arbitrary nesting depth. +</P> +<P> +For some time, Perl has provided a facility that allows regular expressions to +recurse (amongst other things). It does this by interpolating Perl code in the +expression at run time, and the code can refer to the expression itself. A Perl +pattern using code interpolation to solve the parentheses problem can be +created like this: +<pre> + $re = qr{\( (?: (?>[^()]+) | (?p{$re}) )* \)}x; +</pre> +The (?p{...}) item interpolates Perl code at run time, and in this case refers +recursively to the pattern in which it appears. +</P> +<P> +Obviously, PCRE cannot support the interpolation of Perl code. Instead, it +supports special syntax for recursion of the entire pattern, and also for +individual subpattern recursion. After its introduction in PCRE and Python, +this kind of recursion was subsequently introduced into Perl at release 5.10. +</P> +<P> +A special item that consists of (? followed by a number greater than zero and a +closing parenthesis is a recursive subroutine call of the subpattern of the +given number, provided that it occurs inside that subpattern. (If not, it is a +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">non-recursive subroutine</a> +call, which is described in the next section.) The special item (?R) or (?0) is +a recursive call of the entire regular expression. +</P> +<P> +This PCRE pattern solves the nested parentheses problem (assume the +PCRE_EXTENDED option is set so that white space is ignored): +<pre> + \( ( [^()]++ | (?R) )* \) +</pre> +First it matches an opening parenthesis. Then it matches any number of +substrings which can either be a sequence of non-parentheses, or a recursive +match of the pattern itself (that is, a correctly parenthesized substring). +Finally there is a closing parenthesis. Note the use of a possessive quantifier +to avoid backtracking into sequences of non-parentheses. +</P> +<P> +If this were part of a larger pattern, you would not want to recurse the entire +pattern, so instead you could use this: +<pre> + ( \( ( [^()]++ | (?1) )* \) ) +</pre> +We have put the pattern into parentheses, and caused the recursion to refer to +them instead of the whole pattern. +</P> +<P> +In a larger pattern, keeping track of parenthesis numbers can be tricky. This +is made easier by the use of relative references. Instead of (?1) in the +pattern above you can write (?-2) to refer to the second most recently opened +parentheses preceding the recursion. In other words, a negative number counts +capturing parentheses leftwards from the point at which it is encountered. +</P> +<P> +It is also possible to refer to subsequently opened parentheses, by writing +references such as (?+2). However, these cannot be recursive because the +reference is not inside the parentheses that are referenced. They are always +<a href="#subpatternsassubroutines">non-recursive subroutine</a> +calls, as described in the next section. +</P> +<P> +An alternative approach is to use named parentheses instead. The Perl syntax +for this is (?&name); PCRE's earlier syntax (?P>name) is also supported. We +could rewrite the above example as follows: +<pre> + (?<pn> \( ( [^()]++ | (?&pn) )* \) ) +</pre> +If there is more than one subpattern with the same name, the earliest one is +used. +</P> +<P> +This particular example pattern that we have been looking at contains nested +unlimited repeats, and so the use of a possessive quantifier for matching +strings of non-parentheses is important when applying the pattern to strings +that do not match. For example, when this pattern is applied to +<pre> + (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa() +</pre> +it yields "no match" quickly. However, if a possessive quantifier is not used, +the match runs for a very long time indeed because there are so many different +ways the + and * repeats can carve up the subject, and all have to be tested +before failure can be reported. +</P> +<P> +At the end of a match, the values of capturing parentheses are those from +the outermost level. If you want to obtain intermediate values, a callout +function can be used (see below and the +<a href="pcrecallout.html"><b>pcrecallout</b></a> +documentation). If the pattern above is matched against +<pre> + (ab(cd)ef) +</pre> +the value for the inner capturing parentheses (numbered 2) is "ef", which is +the last value taken on at the top level. If a capturing subpattern is not +matched at the top level, its final captured value is unset, even if it was +(temporarily) set at a deeper level during the matching process. +</P> +<P> +If there are more than 15 capturing parentheses in a pattern, PCRE has to +obtain extra memory to store data during a recursion, which it does by using +<b>pcre_malloc</b>, freeing it via <b>pcre_free</b> afterwards. If no memory can +be obtained, the match fails with the PCRE_ERROR_NOMEMORY error. +</P> +<P> +Do not confuse the (?R) item with the condition (R), which tests for recursion. +Consider this pattern, which matches text in angle brackets, allowing for +arbitrary nesting. Only digits are allowed in nested brackets (that is, when +recursing), whereas any characters are permitted at the outer level. +<pre> + < (?: (?(R) \d++ | [^<>]*+) | (?R)) * > +</pre> +In this pattern, (?(R) is the start of a conditional subpattern, with two +different alternatives for the recursive and non-recursive cases. The (?R) item +is the actual recursive call. +<a name="recursiondifference"></a></P> +<br><b> +Differences in recursion processing between PCRE and Perl +</b><br> +<P> +Recursion processing in PCRE differs from Perl in two important ways. In PCRE +(like Python, but unlike Perl), a recursive subpattern call is always treated +as an atomic group. That is, once it has matched some of the subject string, it +is never re-entered, even if it contains untried alternatives and there is a +subsequent matching failure. This can be illustrated by the following pattern, +which purports to match a palindromic string that contains an odd number of +characters (for example, "a", "aba", "abcba", "abcdcba"): +<pre> + ^(.|(.)(?1)\2)$ +</pre> +The idea is that it either matches a single character, or two identical +characters surrounding a sub-palindrome. In Perl, this pattern works; in PCRE +it does not if the pattern is longer than three characters. Consider the +subject string "abcba": +</P> +<P> +At the top level, the first character is matched, but as it is not at the end +of the string, the first alternative fails; the second alternative is taken +and the recursion kicks in. The recursive call to subpattern 1 successfully +matches the next character ("b"). (Note that the beginning and end of line +tests are not part of the recursion). +</P> +<P> +Back at the top level, the next character ("c") is compared with what +subpattern 2 matched, which was "a". This fails. Because the recursion is +treated as an atomic group, there are now no backtracking points, and so the +entire match fails. (Perl is able, at this point, to re-enter the recursion and +try the second alternative.) However, if the pattern is written with the +alternatives in the other order, things are different: +<pre> + ^((.)(?1)\2|.)$ +</pre> +This time, the recursing alternative is tried first, and continues to recurse +until it runs out of characters, at which point the recursion fails. But this +time we do have another alternative to try at the higher level. That is the big +difference: in the previous case the remaining alternative is at a deeper +recursion level, which PCRE cannot use. +</P> +<P> +To change the pattern so that it matches all palindromic strings, not just +those with an odd number of characters, it is tempting to change the pattern to +this: +<pre> + ^((.)(?1)\2|.?)$ +</pre> +Again, this works in Perl, but not in PCRE, and for the same reason. When a +deeper recursion has matched a single character, it cannot be entered again in +order to match an empty string. The solution is to separate the two cases, and +write out the odd and even cases as alternatives at the higher level: +<pre> + ^(?:((.)(?1)\2|)|((.)(?3)\4|.)) +</pre> +If you want to match typical palindromic phrases, the pattern has to ignore all +non-word characters, which can be done like this: +<pre> + ^\W*+(?:((.)\W*+(?1)\W*+\2|)|((.)\W*+(?3)\W*+\4|\W*+.\W*+))\W*+$ +</pre> +If run with the PCRE_CASELESS option, this pattern matches phrases such as "A +man, a plan, a canal: Panama!" and it works well in both PCRE and Perl. Note +the use of the possessive quantifier *+ to avoid backtracking into sequences of +non-word characters. Without this, PCRE takes a great deal longer (ten times or +more) to match typical phrases, and Perl takes so long that you think it has +gone into a loop. +</P> +<P> +<b>WARNING</b>: The palindrome-matching patterns above work only if the subject +string does not start with a palindrome that is shorter than the entire string. +For example, although "abcba" is correctly matched, if the subject is "ababa", +PCRE finds the palindrome "aba" at the start, then fails at top level because +the end of the string does not follow. Once again, it cannot jump back into the +recursion to try other alternatives, so the entire match fails. +</P> +<P> +The second way in which PCRE and Perl differ in their recursion processing is +in the handling of captured values. In Perl, when a subpattern is called +recursively or as a subpattern (see the next section), it has no access to any +values that were captured outside the recursion, whereas in PCRE these values +can be referenced. Consider this pattern: +<pre> + ^(.)(\1|a(?2)) +</pre> +In PCRE, this pattern matches "bab". The first capturing parentheses match "b", +then in the second group, when the back reference \1 fails to match "b", the +second alternative matches "a" and then recurses. In the recursion, \1 does +now match "b" and so the whole match succeeds. In Perl, the pattern fails to +match because inside the recursive call \1 cannot access the externally set +value. +<a name="subpatternsassubroutines"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC24" href="#TOC1">SUBPATTERNS AS SUBROUTINES</a><br> +<P> +If the syntax for a recursive subpattern call (either by number or by +name) is used outside the parentheses to which it refers, it operates like a +subroutine in a programming language. The called subpattern may be defined +before or after the reference. A numbered reference can be absolute or +relative, as in these examples: +<pre> + (...(absolute)...)...(?2)... + (...(relative)...)...(?-1)... + (...(?+1)...(relative)... +</pre> +An earlier example pointed out that the pattern +<pre> + (sens|respons)e and \1ibility +</pre> +matches "sense and sensibility" and "response and responsibility", but not +"sense and responsibility". If instead the pattern +<pre> + (sens|respons)e and (?1)ibility +</pre> +is used, it does match "sense and responsibility" as well as the other two +strings. Another example is given in the discussion of DEFINE above. +</P> +<P> +All subroutine calls, whether recursive or not, are always treated as atomic +groups. That is, once a subroutine has matched some of the subject string, it +is never re-entered, even if it contains untried alternatives and there is a +subsequent matching failure. Any capturing parentheses that are set during the +subroutine call revert to their previous values afterwards. +</P> +<P> +Processing options such as case-independence are fixed when a subpattern is +defined, so if it is used as a subroutine, such options cannot be changed for +different calls. For example, consider this pattern: +<pre> + (abc)(?i:(?-1)) +</pre> +It matches "abcabc". It does not match "abcABC" because the change of +processing option does not affect the called subpattern. +<a name="onigurumasubroutines"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC25" href="#TOC1">ONIGURUMA SUBROUTINE SYNTAX</a><br> +<P> +For compatibility with Oniguruma, the non-Perl syntax \g followed by a name or +a number enclosed either in angle brackets or single quotes, is an alternative +syntax for referencing a subpattern as a subroutine, possibly recursively. Here +are two of the examples used above, rewritten using this syntax: +<pre> + (?<pn> \( ( (?>[^()]+) | \g<pn> )* \) ) + (sens|respons)e and \g'1'ibility +</pre> +PCRE supports an extension to Oniguruma: if a number is preceded by a +plus or a minus sign it is taken as a relative reference. For example: +<pre> + (abc)(?i:\g<-1>) +</pre> +Note that \g{...} (Perl syntax) and \g<...> (Oniguruma syntax) are <i>not</i> +synonymous. The former is a back reference; the latter is a subroutine call. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC26" href="#TOC1">CALLOUTS</a><br> +<P> +Perl has a feature whereby using the sequence (?{...}) causes arbitrary Perl +code to be obeyed in the middle of matching a regular expression. This makes it +possible, amongst other things, to extract different substrings that match the +same pair of parentheses when there is a repetition. +</P> +<P> +PCRE provides a similar feature, but of course it cannot obey arbitrary Perl +code. The feature is called "callout". The caller of PCRE provides an external +function by putting its entry point in the global variable <i>pcre_callout</i> +(8-bit library) or <i>pcre[16|32]_callout</i> (16-bit or 32-bit library). +By default, this variable contains NULL, which disables all calling out. +</P> +<P> +Within a regular expression, (?C) indicates the points at which the external +function is to be called. If you want to identify different callout points, you +can put a number less than 256 after the letter C. The default value is zero. +For example, this pattern has two callout points: +<pre> + (?C1)abc(?C2)def +</pre> +If the PCRE_AUTO_CALLOUT flag is passed to a compiling function, callouts are +automatically installed before each item in the pattern. They are all numbered +255. If there is a conditional group in the pattern whose condition is an +assertion, an additional callout is inserted just before the condition. An +explicit callout may also be set at this position, as in this example: +<pre> + (?(?C9)(?=a)abc|def) +</pre> +Note that this applies only to assertion conditions, not to other types of +condition. +</P> +<P> +During matching, when PCRE reaches a callout point, the external function is +called. It is provided with the number of the callout, the position in the +pattern, and, optionally, one item of data originally supplied by the caller of +the matching function. The callout function may cause matching to proceed, to +backtrack, or to fail altogether. +</P> +<P> +By default, PCRE implements a number of optimizations at compile time and +matching time, and one side-effect is that sometimes callouts are skipped. If +you need all possible callouts to happen, you need to set options that disable +the relevant optimizations. More details, and a complete description of the +interface to the callout function, are given in the +<a href="pcrecallout.html"><b>pcrecallout</b></a> +documentation. +<a name="backtrackcontrol"></a></P> +<br><a name="SEC27" href="#TOC1">BACKTRACKING CONTROL</a><br> +<P> +Perl 5.10 introduced a number of "Special Backtracking Control Verbs", which +are still described in the Perl documentation as "experimental and subject to +change or removal in a future version of Perl". It goes on to say: "Their usage +in production code should be noted to avoid problems during upgrades." The same +remarks apply to the PCRE features described in this section. +</P> +<P> +The new verbs make use of what was previously invalid syntax: an opening +parenthesis followed by an asterisk. They are generally of the form +(*VERB) or (*VERB:NAME). Some may take either form, possibly behaving +differently depending on whether or not a name is present. A name is any +sequence of characters that does not include a closing parenthesis. The maximum +length of name is 255 in the 8-bit library and 65535 in the 16-bit and 32-bit +libraries. If the name is empty, that is, if the closing parenthesis +immediately follows the colon, the effect is as if the colon were not there. +Any number of these verbs may occur in a pattern. +</P> +<P> +Since these verbs are specifically related to backtracking, most of them can be +used only when the pattern is to be matched using one of the traditional +matching functions, because these use a backtracking algorithm. With the +exception of (*FAIL), which behaves like a failing negative assertion, the +backtracking control verbs cause an error if encountered by a DFA matching +function. +</P> +<P> +The behaviour of these verbs in +<a href="#btrepeat">repeated groups,</a> +<a href="#btassert">assertions,</a> +and in +<a href="#btsub">subpatterns called as subroutines</a> +(whether or not recursively) is documented below. +<a name="nooptimize"></a></P> +<br><b> +Optimizations that affect backtracking verbs +</b><br> +<P> +PCRE contains some optimizations that are used to speed up matching by running +some checks at the start of each match attempt. For example, it may know the +minimum length of matching subject, or that a particular character must be +present. When one of these optimizations bypasses the running of a match, any +included backtracking verbs will not, of course, be processed. You can suppress +the start-of-match optimizations by setting the PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE option +when calling <b>pcre_compile()</b> or <b>pcre_exec()</b>, or by starting the +pattern with (*NO_START_OPT). There is more discussion of this option in the +section entitled +<a href="pcreapi.html#execoptions">"Option bits for <b>pcre_exec()</b>"</a> +in the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +documentation. +</P> +<P> +Experiments with Perl suggest that it too has similar optimizations, sometimes +leading to anomalous results. +</P> +<br><b> +Verbs that act immediately +</b><br> +<P> +The following verbs act as soon as they are encountered. They may not be +followed by a name. +<pre> + (*ACCEPT) +</pre> +This verb causes the match to end successfully, skipping the remainder of the +pattern. However, when it is inside a subpattern that is called as a +subroutine, only that subpattern is ended successfully. Matching then continues +at the outer level. If (*ACCEPT) in triggered in a positive assertion, the +assertion succeeds; in a negative assertion, the assertion fails. +</P> +<P> +If (*ACCEPT) is inside capturing parentheses, the data so far is captured. For +example: +<pre> + A((?:A|B(*ACCEPT)|C)D) +</pre> +This matches "AB", "AAD", or "ACD"; when it matches "AB", "B" is captured by +the outer parentheses. +<pre> + (*FAIL) or (*F) +</pre> +This verb causes a matching failure, forcing backtracking to occur. It is +equivalent to (?!) but easier to read. The Perl documentation notes that it is +probably useful only when combined with (?{}) or (??{}). Those are, of course, +Perl features that are not present in PCRE. The nearest equivalent is the +callout feature, as for example in this pattern: +<pre> + a+(?C)(*FAIL) +</pre> +A match with the string "aaaa" always fails, but the callout is taken before +each backtrack happens (in this example, 10 times). +</P> +<br><b> +Recording which path was taken +</b><br> +<P> +There is one verb whose main purpose is to track how a match was arrived at, +though it also has a secondary use in conjunction with advancing the match +starting point (see (*SKIP) below). +<pre> + (*MARK:NAME) or (*:NAME) +</pre> +A name is always required with this verb. There may be as many instances of +(*MARK) as you like in a pattern, and their names do not have to be unique. +</P> +<P> +When a match succeeds, the name of the last-encountered (*MARK:NAME), +(*PRUNE:NAME), or (*THEN:NAME) on the matching path is passed back to the +caller as described in the section entitled +<a href="pcreapi.html#extradata">"Extra data for <b>pcre_exec()</b>"</a> +in the +<a href="pcreapi.html"><b>pcreapi</b></a> +documentation. Here is an example of <b>pcretest</b> output, where the /K +modifier requests the retrieval and outputting of (*MARK) data: +<pre> + re> /X(*MARK:A)Y|X(*MARK:B)Z/K + data> XY + 0: XY + MK: A + XZ + 0: XZ + MK: B +</pre> +The (*MARK) name is tagged with "MK:" in this output, and in this example it +indicates which of the two alternatives matched. This is a more efficient way +of obtaining this information than putting each alternative in its own +capturing parentheses. +</P> +<P> +If a verb with a name is encountered in a positive assertion that is true, the +name is recorded and passed back if it is the last-encountered. This does not +happen for negative assertions or failing positive assertions. +</P> +<P> +After a partial match or a failed match, the last encountered name in the +entire match process is returned. For example: +<pre> + re> /X(*MARK:A)Y|X(*MARK:B)Z/K + data> XP + No match, mark = B +</pre> +Note that in this unanchored example the mark is retained from the match +attempt that started at the letter "X" in the subject. Subsequent match +attempts starting at "P" and then with an empty string do not get as far as the +(*MARK) item, but nevertheless do not reset it. +</P> +<P> +If you are interested in (*MARK) values after failed matches, you should +probably set the PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE option +<a href="#nooptimize">(see above)</a> +to ensure that the match is always attempted. +</P> +<br><b> +Verbs that act after backtracking +</b><br> +<P> +The following verbs do nothing when they are encountered. Matching continues +with what follows, but if there is no subsequent match, causing a backtrack to +the verb, a failure is forced. That is, backtracking cannot pass to the left of +the verb. However, when one of these verbs appears inside an atomic group or an +assertion that is true, its effect is confined to that group, because once the +group has been matched, there is never any backtracking into it. In this +situation, backtracking can "jump back" to the left of the entire atomic group +or assertion. (Remember also, as stated above, that this localization also +applies in subroutine calls.) +</P> +<P> +These verbs differ in exactly what kind of failure occurs when backtracking +reaches them. The behaviour described below is what happens when the verb is +not in a subroutine or an assertion. Subsequent sections cover these special +cases. +<pre> + (*COMMIT) +</pre> +This verb, which may not be followed by a name, causes the whole match to fail +outright if there is a later matching failure that causes backtracking to reach +it. Even if the pattern is unanchored, no further attempts to find a match by +advancing the starting point take place. If (*COMMIT) is the only backtracking +verb that is encountered, once it has been passed <b>pcre_exec()</b> is +committed to finding a match at the current starting point, or not at all. For +example: +<pre> + a+(*COMMIT)b +</pre> +This matches "xxaab" but not "aacaab". It can be thought of as a kind of +dynamic anchor, or "I've started, so I must finish." The name of the most +recently passed (*MARK) in the path is passed back when (*COMMIT) forces a +match failure. +</P> +<P> +If there is more than one backtracking verb in a pattern, a different one that +follows (*COMMIT) may be triggered first, so merely passing (*COMMIT) during a +match does not always guarantee that a match must be at this starting point. +</P> +<P> +Note that (*COMMIT) at the start of a pattern is not the same as an anchor, +unless PCRE's start-of-match optimizations are turned off, as shown in this +output from <b>pcretest</b>: +<pre> + re> /(*COMMIT)abc/ + data> xyzabc + 0: abc + data> xyzabc\Y + No match +</pre> +For this pattern, PCRE knows that any match must start with "a", so the +optimization skips along the subject to "a" before applying the pattern to the +first set of data. The match attempt then succeeds. In the second set of data, +the escape sequence \Y is interpreted by the <b>pcretest</b> program. It causes +the PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE option to be set when <b>pcre_exec()</b> is called. +This disables the optimization that skips along to the first character. The +pattern is now applied starting at "x", and so the (*COMMIT) causes the match +to fail without trying any other starting points. +<pre> + (*PRUNE) or (*PRUNE:NAME) +</pre> +This verb causes the match to fail at the current starting position in the +subject if there is a later matching failure that causes backtracking to reach +it. If the pattern is unanchored, the normal "bumpalong" advance to the next +starting character then happens. Backtracking can occur as usual to the left of +(*PRUNE), before it is reached, or when matching to the right of (*PRUNE), but +if there is no match to the right, backtracking cannot cross (*PRUNE). In +simple cases, the use of (*PRUNE) is just an alternative to an atomic group or +possessive quantifier, but there are some uses of (*PRUNE) that cannot be +expressed in any other way. In an anchored pattern (*PRUNE) has the same effect +as (*COMMIT). +</P> +<P> +The behaviour of (*PRUNE:NAME) is the not the same as (*MARK:NAME)(*PRUNE). +It is like (*MARK:NAME) in that the name is remembered for passing back to the +caller. However, (*SKIP:NAME) searches only for names set with (*MARK). +<pre> + (*SKIP) +</pre> +This verb, when given without a name, is like (*PRUNE), except that if the +pattern is unanchored, the "bumpalong" advance is not to the next character, +but to the position in the subject where (*SKIP) was encountered. (*SKIP) +signifies that whatever text was matched leading up to it cannot be part of a +successful match. Consider: +<pre> + a+(*SKIP)b +</pre> +If the subject is "aaaac...", after the first match attempt fails (starting at +the first character in the string), the starting point skips on to start the +next attempt at "c". Note that a possessive quantifer does not have the same +effect as this example; although it would suppress backtracking during the +first match attempt, the second attempt would start at the second character +instead of skipping on to "c". +<pre> + (*SKIP:NAME) +</pre> +When (*SKIP) has an associated name, its behaviour is modified. When it is +triggered, the previous path through the pattern is searched for the most +recent (*MARK) that has the same name. If one is found, the "bumpalong" advance +is to the subject position that corresponds to that (*MARK) instead of to where +(*SKIP) was encountered. If no (*MARK) with a matching name is found, the +(*SKIP) is ignored. +</P> +<P> +Note that (*SKIP:NAME) searches only for names set by (*MARK:NAME). It ignores +names that are set by (*PRUNE:NAME) or (*THEN:NAME). +<pre> + (*THEN) or (*THEN:NAME) +</pre> +This verb causes a skip to the next innermost alternative when backtracking +reaches it. That is, it cancels any further backtracking within the current +alternative. Its name comes from the observation that it can be used for a +pattern-based if-then-else block: +<pre> + ( COND1 (*THEN) FOO | COND2 (*THEN) BAR | COND3 (*THEN) BAZ ) ... +</pre> +If the COND1 pattern matches, FOO is tried (and possibly further items after +the end of the group if FOO succeeds); on failure, the matcher skips to the +second alternative and tries COND2, without backtracking into COND1. If that +succeeds and BAR fails, COND3 is tried. If subsequently BAZ fails, there are no +more alternatives, so there is a backtrack to whatever came before the entire +group. If (*THEN) is not inside an alternation, it acts like (*PRUNE). +</P> +<P> +The behaviour of (*THEN:NAME) is the not the same as (*MARK:NAME)(*THEN). +It is like (*MARK:NAME) in that the name is remembered for passing back to the +caller. However, (*SKIP:NAME) searches only for names set with (*MARK). +</P> +<P> +A subpattern that does not contain a | character is just a part of the +enclosing alternative; it is not a nested alternation with only one +alternative. The effect of (*THEN) extends beyond such a subpattern to the +enclosing alternative. Consider this pattern, where A, B, etc. are complex +pattern fragments that do not contain any | characters at this level: +<pre> + A (B(*THEN)C) | D +</pre> +If A and B are matched, but there is a failure in C, matching does not +backtrack into A; instead it moves to the next alternative, that is, D. +However, if the subpattern containing (*THEN) is given an alternative, it +behaves differently: +<pre> + A (B(*THEN)C | (*FAIL)) | D +</pre> +The effect of (*THEN) is now confined to the inner subpattern. After a failure +in C, matching moves to (*FAIL), which causes the whole subpattern to fail +because there are no more alternatives to try. In this case, matching does now +backtrack into A. +</P> +<P> +Note that a conditional subpattern is not considered as having two +alternatives, because only one is ever used. In other words, the | character in +a conditional subpattern has a different meaning. Ignoring white space, +consider: +<pre> + ^.*? (?(?=a) a | b(*THEN)c ) +</pre> +If the subject is "ba", this pattern does not match. Because .*? is ungreedy, +it initially matches zero characters. The condition (?=a) then fails, the +character "b" is matched, but "c" is not. At this point, matching does not +backtrack to .*? as might perhaps be expected from the presence of the | +character. The conditional subpattern is part of the single alternative that +comprises the whole pattern, and so the match fails. (If there was a backtrack +into .*?, allowing it to match "b", the match would succeed.) +</P> +<P> +The verbs just described provide four different "strengths" of control when +subsequent matching fails. (*THEN) is the weakest, carrying on the match at the +next alternative. (*PRUNE) comes next, failing the match at the current +starting position, but allowing an advance to the next character (for an +unanchored pattern). (*SKIP) is similar, except that the advance may be more +than one character. (*COMMIT) is the strongest, causing the entire match to +fail. +</P> +<br><b> +More than one backtracking verb +</b><br> +<P> +If more than one backtracking verb is present in a pattern, the one that is +backtracked onto first acts. For example, consider this pattern, where A, B, +etc. are complex pattern fragments: +<pre> + (A(*COMMIT)B(*THEN)C|ABD) +</pre> +If A matches but B fails, the backtrack to (*COMMIT) causes the entire match to +fail. However, if A and B match, but C fails, the backtrack to (*THEN) causes +the next alternative (ABD) to be tried. This behaviour is consistent, but is +not always the same as Perl's. It means that if two or more backtracking verbs +appear in succession, all the the last of them has no effect. Consider this +example: +<pre> + ...(*COMMIT)(*PRUNE)... +</pre> +If there is a matching failure to the right, backtracking onto (*PRUNE) causes +it to be triggered, and its action is taken. There can never be a backtrack +onto (*COMMIT). +<a name="btrepeat"></a></P> +<br><b> +Backtracking verbs in repeated groups +</b><br> +<P> +PCRE differs from Perl in its handling of backtracking verbs in repeated +groups. For example, consider: +<pre> + /(a(*COMMIT)b)+ac/ +</pre> +If the subject is "abac", Perl matches, but PCRE fails because the (*COMMIT) in +the second repeat of the group acts. +<a name="btassert"></a></P> +<br><b> +Backtracking verbs in assertions +</b><br> +<P> +(*FAIL) in an assertion has its normal effect: it forces an immediate backtrack. +</P> +<P> +(*ACCEPT) in a positive assertion causes the assertion to succeed without any +further processing. In a negative assertion, (*ACCEPT) causes the assertion to +fail without any further processing. +</P> +<P> +The other backtracking verbs are not treated specially if they appear in a +positive assertion. In particular, (*THEN) skips to the next alternative in the +innermost enclosing group that has alternations, whether or not this is within +the assertion. +</P> +<P> +Negative assertions are, however, different, in order to ensure that changing a +positive assertion into a negative assertion changes its result. Backtracking +into (*COMMIT), (*SKIP), or (*PRUNE) causes a negative assertion to be true, +without considering any further alternative branches in the assertion. +Backtracking into (*THEN) causes it to skip to the next enclosing alternative +within the assertion (the normal behaviour), but if the assertion does not have +such an alternative, (*THEN) behaves like (*PRUNE). +<a name="btsub"></a></P> +<br><b> +Backtracking verbs in subroutines +</b><br> +<P> +These behaviours occur whether or not the subpattern is called recursively. +Perl's treatment of subroutines is different in some cases. +</P> +<P> +(*FAIL) in a subpattern called as a subroutine has its normal effect: it forces +an immediate backtrack. +</P> +<P> +(*ACCEPT) in a subpattern called as a subroutine causes the subroutine match to +succeed without any further processing. Matching then continues after the +subroutine call. +</P> +<P> +(*COMMIT), (*SKIP), and (*PRUNE) in a subpattern called as a subroutine cause +the subroutine match to fail. +</P> +<P> +(*THEN) skips to the next alternative in the innermost enclosing group within +the subpattern that has alternatives. If there is no such group within the +subpattern, (*THEN) causes the subroutine match to fail. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC28" href="#TOC1">SEE ALSO</a><br> +<P> +<b>pcreapi</b>(3), <b>pcrecallout</b>(3), <b>pcrematching</b>(3), +<b>pcresyntax</b>(3), <b>pcre</b>(3), <b>pcre16(3)</b>, <b>pcre32(3)</b>. +</P> +<br><a name="SEC29" href="#TOC1">AUTHOR</a><br> +<P> +Philip Hazel +<br> +University Computing Service +<br> +Cambridge CB2 3QH, England. +<br> +</P> +<br><a name="SEC30" href="#TOC1">REVISION</a><br> +<P> +Last updated: 08 January 2014 +<br> +Copyright © 1997-2014 University of Cambridge. +<br> +<p> +Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE index page</a>. +</p> |