summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html')
-rw-r--r--libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html499
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 499 deletions
diff --git a/libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html b/libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html
deleted file mode 100644
index abb342522f..0000000000
--- a/libs/Pcre16/docs/doc/html/pcrejit.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,499 +0,0 @@
-<html>
-<head>
-<title>pcrejit specification</title>
-</head>
-<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#00005A" link="#0066FF" alink="#3399FF" vlink="#2222BB">
-<h1>pcrejit man page</h1>
-<p>
-Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE index page</a>.
-</p>
-<p>
-This page is part of the PCRE HTML documentation. It was generated automatically
-from the original man page. If there is any nonsense in it, please consult the
-man page, in case the conversion went wrong.
-<br>
-<ul>
-<li><a name="TOC1" href="#SEC1">PCRE JUST-IN-TIME COMPILER SUPPORT</a>
-<li><a name="TOC2" href="#SEC2">8-BIT, 16-BIT AND 32-BIT SUPPORT</a>
-<li><a name="TOC3" href="#SEC3">AVAILABILITY OF JIT SUPPORT</a>
-<li><a name="TOC4" href="#SEC4">SIMPLE USE OF JIT</a>
-<li><a name="TOC5" href="#SEC5">UNSUPPORTED OPTIONS AND PATTERN ITEMS</a>
-<li><a name="TOC6" href="#SEC6">RETURN VALUES FROM JIT EXECUTION</a>
-<li><a name="TOC7" href="#SEC7">SAVING AND RESTORING COMPILED PATTERNS</a>
-<li><a name="TOC8" href="#SEC8">CONTROLLING THE JIT STACK</a>
-<li><a name="TOC9" href="#SEC9">JIT STACK FAQ</a>
-<li><a name="TOC10" href="#SEC10">EXAMPLE CODE</a>
-<li><a name="TOC11" href="#SEC11">JIT FAST PATH API</a>
-<li><a name="TOC12" href="#SEC12">SEE ALSO</a>
-<li><a name="TOC13" href="#SEC13">AUTHOR</a>
-<li><a name="TOC14" href="#SEC14">REVISION</a>
-</ul>
-<br><a name="SEC1" href="#TOC1">PCRE JUST-IN-TIME COMPILER SUPPORT</a><br>
-<P>
-Just-in-time compiling is a heavyweight optimization that can greatly speed up
-pattern matching. However, it comes at the cost of extra processing before the
-match is performed. Therefore, it is of most benefit when the same pattern is
-going to be matched many times. This does not necessarily mean many calls of a
-matching function; if the pattern is not anchored, matching attempts may take
-place many times at various positions in the subject, even for a single call.
-Therefore, if the subject string is very long, it may still pay to use JIT for
-one-off matches.
-</P>
-<P>
-JIT support applies only to the traditional Perl-compatible matching function.
-It does not apply when the DFA matching function is being used. The code for
-this support was written by Zoltan Herczeg.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC2" href="#TOC1">8-BIT, 16-BIT AND 32-BIT SUPPORT</a><br>
-<P>
-JIT support is available for all of the 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit PCRE
-libraries. To keep this documentation simple, only the 8-bit interface is
-described in what follows. If you are using the 16-bit library, substitute the
-16-bit functions and 16-bit structures (for example, <i>pcre16_jit_stack</i>
-instead of <i>pcre_jit_stack</i>). If you are using the 32-bit library,
-substitute the 32-bit functions and 32-bit structures (for example,
-<i>pcre32_jit_stack</i> instead of <i>pcre_jit_stack</i>).
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC3" href="#TOC1">AVAILABILITY OF JIT SUPPORT</a><br>
-<P>
-JIT support is an optional feature of PCRE. The "configure" option --enable-jit
-(or equivalent CMake option) must be set when PCRE is built if you want to use
-JIT. The support is limited to the following hardware platforms:
-<pre>
- ARM v5, v7, and Thumb2
- Intel x86 32-bit and 64-bit
- MIPS 32-bit
- Power PC 32-bit and 64-bit
- SPARC 32-bit (experimental)
-</pre>
-If --enable-jit is set on an unsupported platform, compilation fails.
-</P>
-<P>
-A program that is linked with PCRE 8.20 or later can tell if JIT support is
-available by calling <b>pcre_config()</b> with the PCRE_CONFIG_JIT option. The
-result is 1 when JIT is available, and 0 otherwise. However, a simple program
-does not need to check this in order to use JIT. The normal API is implemented
-in a way that falls back to the interpretive code if JIT is not available. For
-programs that need the best possible performance, there is also a "fast path"
-API that is JIT-specific.
-</P>
-<P>
-If your program may sometimes be linked with versions of PCRE that are older
-than 8.20, but you want to use JIT when it is available, you can test the
-values of PCRE_MAJOR and PCRE_MINOR, or the existence of a JIT macro such as
-PCRE_CONFIG_JIT, for compile-time control of your code. Also beware that the
-<b>pcre_jit_exec()</b> function was not available at all before 8.32,
-and may not be available at all if PCRE isn't compiled with
---enable-jit. See the "JIT FAST PATH API" section below for details.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC4" href="#TOC1">SIMPLE USE OF JIT</a><br>
-<P>
-You have to do two things to make use of the JIT support in the simplest way:
-<pre>
- (1) Call <b>pcre_study()</b> with the PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE option for
- each compiled pattern, and pass the resulting <b>pcre_extra</b> block to
- <b>pcre_exec()</b>.
-
- (2) Use <b>pcre_free_study()</b> to free the <b>pcre_extra</b> block when it is
- no longer needed, instead of just freeing it yourself. This ensures that
- any JIT data is also freed.
-</pre>
-For a program that may be linked with pre-8.20 versions of PCRE, you can insert
-<pre>
- #ifndef PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE
- #define PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE 0
- #endif
-</pre>
-so that no option is passed to <b>pcre_study()</b>, and then use something like
-this to free the study data:
-<pre>
- #ifdef PCRE_CONFIG_JIT
- pcre_free_study(study_ptr);
- #else
- pcre_free(study_ptr);
- #endif
-</pre>
-PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE requests the JIT compiler to generate code for complete
-matches. If you want to run partial matches using the PCRE_PARTIAL_HARD or
-PCRE_PARTIAL_SOFT options of <b>pcre_exec()</b>, you should set one or both of
-the following options in addition to, or instead of, PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE
-when you call <b>pcre_study()</b>:
-<pre>
- PCRE_STUDY_JIT_PARTIAL_HARD_COMPILE
- PCRE_STUDY_JIT_PARTIAL_SOFT_COMPILE
-</pre>
-If using <b>pcre_jit_exec()</b> and supporting a pre-8.32 version of
-PCRE, you can insert:
-<pre>
- #if PCRE_MAJOR &#62;= 8 && PCRE_MINOR &#62;= 32
- pcre_jit_exec(...);
- #else
- pcre_exec(...)
- #endif
-</pre>
-but as described in the "JIT FAST PATH API" section below this assumes
-version 8.32 and later are compiled with --enable-jit, which may
-break.
-<br>
-<br>
-The JIT compiler generates different optimized code for each of the three
-modes (normal, soft partial, hard partial). When <b>pcre_exec()</b> is called,
-the appropriate code is run if it is available. Otherwise, the pattern is
-matched using interpretive code.
-</P>
-<P>
-In some circumstances you may need to call additional functions. These are
-described in the section entitled
-<a href="#stackcontrol">"Controlling the JIT stack"</a>
-below.
-</P>
-<P>
-If JIT support is not available, PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc. are ignored, and
-no JIT data is created. Otherwise, the compiled pattern is passed to the JIT
-compiler, which turns it into machine code that executes much faster than the
-normal interpretive code. When <b>pcre_exec()</b> is passed a <b>pcre_extra</b>
-block containing a pointer to JIT code of the appropriate mode (normal or
-hard/soft partial), it obeys that code instead of running the interpreter. The
-result is identical, but the compiled JIT code runs much faster.
-</P>
-<P>
-There are some <b>pcre_exec()</b> options that are not supported for JIT
-execution. There are also some pattern items that JIT cannot handle. Details
-are given below. In both cases, execution automatically falls back to the
-interpretive code. If you want to know whether JIT was actually used for a
-particular match, you should arrange for a JIT callback function to be set up
-as described in the section entitled
-<a href="#stackcontrol">"Controlling the JIT stack"</a>
-below, even if you do not need to supply a non-default JIT stack. Such a
-callback function is called whenever JIT code is about to be obeyed. If the
-execution options are not right for JIT execution, the callback function is not
-obeyed.
-</P>
-<P>
-If the JIT compiler finds an unsupported item, no JIT data is generated. You
-can find out if JIT execution is available after studying a pattern by calling
-<b>pcre_fullinfo()</b> with the PCRE_INFO_JIT option. A result of 1 means that
-JIT compilation was successful. A result of 0 means that JIT support is not
-available, or the pattern was not studied with PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc., or
-the JIT compiler was not able to handle the pattern.
-</P>
-<P>
-Once a pattern has been studied, with or without JIT, it can be used as many
-times as you like for matching different subject strings.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC5" href="#TOC1">UNSUPPORTED OPTIONS AND PATTERN ITEMS</a><br>
-<P>
-The only <b>pcre_exec()</b> options that are supported for JIT execution are
-PCRE_NO_UTF8_CHECK, PCRE_NO_UTF16_CHECK, PCRE_NO_UTF32_CHECK, PCRE_NOTBOL,
-PCRE_NOTEOL, PCRE_NOTEMPTY, PCRE_NOTEMPTY_ATSTART, PCRE_PARTIAL_HARD, and
-PCRE_PARTIAL_SOFT.
-</P>
-<P>
-The only unsupported pattern items are \C (match a single data unit) when
-running in a UTF mode, and a callout immediately before an assertion condition
-in a conditional group.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC6" href="#TOC1">RETURN VALUES FROM JIT EXECUTION</a><br>
-<P>
-When a pattern is matched using JIT execution, the return values are the same
-as those given by the interpretive <b>pcre_exec()</b> code, with the addition of
-one new error code: PCRE_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT. This means that the memory used
-for the JIT stack was insufficient. See
-<a href="#stackcontrol">"Controlling the JIT stack"</a>
-below for a discussion of JIT stack usage. For compatibility with the
-interpretive <b>pcre_exec()</b> code, no more than two-thirds of the
-<i>ovector</i> argument is used for passing back captured substrings.
-</P>
-<P>
-The error code PCRE_ERROR_MATCHLIMIT is returned by the JIT code if searching a
-very large pattern tree goes on for too long, as it is in the same circumstance
-when JIT is not used, but the details of exactly what is counted are not the
-same. The PCRE_ERROR_RECURSIONLIMIT error code is never returned by JIT
-execution.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC7" href="#TOC1">SAVING AND RESTORING COMPILED PATTERNS</a><br>
-<P>
-The code that is generated by the JIT compiler is architecture-specific, and is
-also position dependent. For those reasons it cannot be saved (in a file or
-database) and restored later like the bytecode and other data of a compiled
-pattern. Saving and restoring compiled patterns is not something many people
-do. More detail about this facility is given in the
-<a href="pcreprecompile.html"><b>pcreprecompile</b></a>
-documentation. It should be possible to run <b>pcre_study()</b> on a saved and
-restored pattern, and thereby recreate the JIT data, but because JIT
-compilation uses significant resources, it is probably not worth doing this;
-you might as well recompile the original pattern.
-<a name="stackcontrol"></a></P>
-<br><a name="SEC8" href="#TOC1">CONTROLLING THE JIT STACK</a><br>
-<P>
-When the compiled JIT code runs, it needs a block of memory to use as a stack.
-By default, it uses 32K on the machine stack. However, some large or
-complicated patterns need more than this. The error PCRE_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT
-is given when there is not enough stack. Three functions are provided for
-managing blocks of memory for use as JIT stacks. There is further discussion
-about the use of JIT stacks in the section entitled
-<a href="#stackcontrol">"JIT stack FAQ"</a>
-below.
-</P>
-<P>
-The <b>pcre_jit_stack_alloc()</b> function creates a JIT stack. Its arguments
-are a starting size and a maximum size, and it returns a pointer to an opaque
-structure of type <b>pcre_jit_stack</b>, or NULL if there is an error. The
-<b>pcre_jit_stack_free()</b> function can be used to free a stack that is no
-longer needed. (For the technically minded: the address space is allocated by
-mmap or VirtualAlloc.)
-</P>
-<P>
-JIT uses far less memory for recursion than the interpretive code,
-and a maximum stack size of 512K to 1M should be more than enough for any
-pattern.
-</P>
-<P>
-The <b>pcre_assign_jit_stack()</b> function specifies which stack JIT code
-should use. Its arguments are as follows:
-<pre>
- pcre_extra *extra
- pcre_jit_callback callback
- void *data
-</pre>
-The <i>extra</i> argument must be the result of studying a pattern with
-PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc. There are three cases for the values of the other
-two options:
-<pre>
- (1) If <i>callback</i> is NULL and <i>data</i> is NULL, an internal 32K block
- on the machine stack is used.
-
- (2) If <i>callback</i> is NULL and <i>data</i> is not NULL, <i>data</i> must be
- a valid JIT stack, the result of calling <b>pcre_jit_stack_alloc()</b>.
-
- (3) If <i>callback</i> is not NULL, it must point to a function that is
- called with <i>data</i> as an argument at the start of matching, in
- order to set up a JIT stack. If the return from the callback
- function is NULL, the internal 32K stack is used; otherwise the
- return value must be a valid JIT stack, the result of calling
- <b>pcre_jit_stack_alloc()</b>.
-</pre>
-A callback function is obeyed whenever JIT code is about to be run; it is not
-obeyed when <b>pcre_exec()</b> is called with options that are incompatible for
-JIT execution. A callback function can therefore be used to determine whether a
-match operation was executed by JIT or by the interpreter.
-</P>
-<P>
-You may safely use the same JIT stack for more than one pattern (either by
-assigning directly or by callback), as long as the patterns are all matched
-sequentially in the same thread. In a multithread application, if you do not
-specify a JIT stack, or if you assign or pass back NULL from a callback, that
-is thread-safe, because each thread has its own machine stack. However, if you
-assign or pass back a non-NULL JIT stack, this must be a different stack for
-each thread so that the application is thread-safe.
-</P>
-<P>
-Strictly speaking, even more is allowed. You can assign the same non-NULL stack
-to any number of patterns as long as they are not used for matching by multiple
-threads at the same time. For example, you can assign the same stack to all
-compiled patterns, and use a global mutex in the callback to wait until the
-stack is available for use. However, this is an inefficient solution, and not
-recommended.
-</P>
-<P>
-This is a suggestion for how a multithreaded program that needs to set up
-non-default JIT stacks might operate:
-<pre>
- During thread initalization
- thread_local_var = pcre_jit_stack_alloc(...)
-
- During thread exit
- pcre_jit_stack_free(thread_local_var)
-
- Use a one-line callback function
- return thread_local_var
-</pre>
-All the functions described in this section do nothing if JIT is not available,
-and <b>pcre_assign_jit_stack()</b> does nothing unless the <b>extra</b> argument
-is non-NULL and points to a <b>pcre_extra</b> block that is the result of a
-successful study with PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc.
-<a name="stackfaq"></a></P>
-<br><a name="SEC9" href="#TOC1">JIT STACK FAQ</a><br>
-<P>
-(1) Why do we need JIT stacks?
-<br>
-<br>
-PCRE (and JIT) is a recursive, depth-first engine, so it needs a stack where
-the local data of the current node is pushed before checking its child nodes.
-Allocating real machine stack on some platforms is difficult. For example, the
-stack chain needs to be updated every time if we extend the stack on PowerPC.
-Although it is possible, its updating time overhead decreases performance. So
-we do the recursion in memory.
-</P>
-<P>
-(2) Why don't we simply allocate blocks of memory with <b>malloc()</b>?
-<br>
-<br>
-Modern operating systems have a nice feature: they can reserve an address space
-instead of allocating memory. We can safely allocate memory pages inside this
-address space, so the stack could grow without moving memory data (this is
-important because of pointers). Thus we can allocate 1M address space, and use
-only a single memory page (usually 4K) if that is enough. However, we can still
-grow up to 1M anytime if needed.
-</P>
-<P>
-(3) Who "owns" a JIT stack?
-<br>
-<br>
-The owner of the stack is the user program, not the JIT studied pattern or
-anything else. The user program must ensure that if a stack is used by
-<b>pcre_exec()</b>, (that is, it is assigned to the pattern currently running),
-that stack must not be used by any other threads (to avoid overwriting the same
-memory area). The best practice for multithreaded programs is to allocate a
-stack for each thread, and return this stack through the JIT callback function.
-</P>
-<P>
-(4) When should a JIT stack be freed?
-<br>
-<br>
-You can free a JIT stack at any time, as long as it will not be used by
-<b>pcre_exec()</b> again. When you assign the stack to a pattern, only a pointer
-is set. There is no reference counting or any other magic. You can free the
-patterns and stacks in any order, anytime. Just <i>do not</i> call
-<b>pcre_exec()</b> with a pattern pointing to an already freed stack, as that
-will cause SEGFAULT. (Also, do not free a stack currently used by
-<b>pcre_exec()</b> in another thread). You can also replace the stack for a
-pattern at any time. You can even free the previous stack before assigning a
-replacement.
-</P>
-<P>
-(5) Should I allocate/free a stack every time before/after calling
-<b>pcre_exec()</b>?
-<br>
-<br>
-No, because this is too costly in terms of resources. However, you could
-implement some clever idea which release the stack if it is not used in let's
-say two minutes. The JIT callback can help to achieve this without keeping a
-list of the currently JIT studied patterns.
-</P>
-<P>
-(6) OK, the stack is for long term memory allocation. But what happens if a
-pattern causes stack overflow with a stack of 1M? Is that 1M kept until the
-stack is freed?
-<br>
-<br>
-Especially on embedded sytems, it might be a good idea to release memory
-sometimes without freeing the stack. There is no API for this at the moment.
-Probably a function call which returns with the currently allocated memory for
-any stack and another which allows releasing memory (shrinking the stack) would
-be a good idea if someone needs this.
-</P>
-<P>
-(7) This is too much of a headache. Isn't there any better solution for JIT
-stack handling?
-<br>
-<br>
-No, thanks to Windows. If POSIX threads were used everywhere, we could throw
-out this complicated API.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC10" href="#TOC1">EXAMPLE CODE</a><br>
-<P>
-This is a single-threaded example that specifies a JIT stack without using a
-callback.
-<pre>
- int rc;
- int ovector[30];
- pcre *re;
- pcre_extra *extra;
- pcre_jit_stack *jit_stack;
-
- re = pcre_compile(pattern, 0, &error, &erroffset, NULL);
- /* Check for errors */
- extra = pcre_study(re, PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE, &error);
- jit_stack = pcre_jit_stack_alloc(32*1024, 512*1024);
- /* Check for error (NULL) */
- pcre_assign_jit_stack(extra, NULL, jit_stack);
- rc = pcre_exec(re, extra, subject, length, 0, 0, ovector, 30);
- /* Check results */
- pcre_free(re);
- pcre_free_study(extra);
- pcre_jit_stack_free(jit_stack);
-
-</PRE>
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC11" href="#TOC1">JIT FAST PATH API</a><br>
-<P>
-Because the API described above falls back to interpreted execution when JIT is
-not available, it is convenient for programs that are written for general use
-in many environments. However, calling JIT via <b>pcre_exec()</b> does have a
-performance impact. Programs that are written for use where JIT is known to be
-available, and which need the best possible performance, can instead use a
-"fast path" API to call JIT execution directly instead of calling
-<b>pcre_exec()</b> (obviously only for patterns that have been successfully
-studied by JIT).
-</P>
-<P>
-The fast path function is called <b>pcre_jit_exec()</b>, and it takes exactly
-the same arguments as <b>pcre_exec()</b>, plus one additional argument that
-must point to a JIT stack. The JIT stack arrangements described above do not
-apply. The return values are the same as for <b>pcre_exec()</b>.
-</P>
-<P>
-When you call <b>pcre_exec()</b>, as well as testing for invalid options, a
-number of other sanity checks are performed on the arguments. For example, if
-the subject pointer is NULL, or its length is negative, an immediate error is
-given. Also, unless PCRE_NO_UTF[8|16|32] is set, a UTF subject string is tested
-for validity. In the interests of speed, these checks do not happen on the JIT
-fast path, and if invalid data is passed, the result is undefined.
-</P>
-<P>
-Bypassing the sanity checks and the <b>pcre_exec()</b> wrapping can give
-speedups of more than 10%.
-</P>
-<P>
-Note that the <b>pcre_jit_exec()</b> function is not available in versions of
-PCRE before 8.32 (released in November 2012). If you need to support versions
-that old you must either use the slower <b>pcre_exec()</b>, or switch between
-the two codepaths by checking the values of PCRE_MAJOR and PCRE_MINOR.
-</P>
-<P>
-Due to an unfortunate implementation oversight, even in versions 8.32
-and later there will be no <b>pcre_jit_exec()</b> stub function defined
-when PCRE is compiled with --disable-jit, which is the default, and
-there's no way to detect whether PCRE was compiled with --enable-jit
-via a macro.
-</P>
-<P>
-If you need to support versions older than 8.32, or versions that may
-not build with --enable-jit, you must either use the slower
-<b>pcre_exec()</b>, or switch between the two codepaths by checking the
-values of PCRE_MAJOR and PCRE_MINOR.
-</P>
-<P>
-Switching between the two by checking the version assumes that all the
-versions being targeted are built with --enable-jit. To also support
-builds that may use --disable-jit either <b>pcre_exec()</b> must be
-used, or a compile-time check for JIT via <b>pcre_config()</b> (which
-assumes the runtime environment will be the same), or as the Git
-project decided to do, simply assume that <b>pcre_jit_exec()</b> is
-present in 8.32 or later unless a compile-time flag is provided, see
-the "grep: un-break building with PCRE &#62;= 8.32 without --enable-jit"
-commit in git.git for an example of that.
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC12" href="#TOC1">SEE ALSO</a><br>
-<P>
-<b>pcreapi</b>(3)
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC13" href="#TOC1">AUTHOR</a><br>
-<P>
-Philip Hazel (FAQ by Zoltan Herczeg)
-<br>
-University Computing Service
-<br>
-Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
-<br>
-</P>
-<br><a name="SEC14" href="#TOC1">REVISION</a><br>
-<P>
-Last updated: 05 July 2017
-<br>
-Copyright &copy; 1997-2017 University of Cambridge.
-<br>
-<p>
-Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE index page</a>.
-</p>